Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomers find 'home from home' - 90 light years away!
spaceref.com ^ | 3 Jul 03 | staff

Posted on 07/03/2003 10:22:13 AM PDT by RightWhale

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361 next last
To: RightWhale
Does this mean that you would wish to take earth culture with you? Wouldn't that be excess baggage?

And risk repeating 6000 years of mistakes???! Leave everything behind when we've learned ..so.....much..........

I see your point.

61 posted on 07/03/2003 2:39:17 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Are they implying that earth like planets may also be orbiting this star?

Following up on the explanations, Jupiter-like planets mark the point where the rocky planets separate from the gaseous planets. The solar system forms when gas and dust begin to swirl and rotate. As the dust molecules stick to each other, they get denser and begin to attract each other. The heavier ones fall to the center of the dust cloud and begin to form the star. Others clump together at various orbital distances relative to their mass and become the basis for the planets. Once the density of the protostar reaches the point of ignition, the star "lights up" and the explosion blows away all the loose dust, leaving the rocky clumps to become the planets (the dust is pushed to the outer limits, probably becoming the Oort Cloud that births comets). The clumps further away become the gas giants, like Jupiter. The "no man's land" between the rocky planets and the gas giants would be like the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

If a Jupiter-like planet were to have an elliptical orbit, it would sweep up all the inner dust, preventing the inner rocky planets from forming. A circular orbit would allow other circular-orbiting planets to form. That is why a Jupiter-like planet around a star is a promising sign.

-PJ

(I hope I got that right to a layman's degree of accuracy)

62 posted on 07/03/2003 2:39:38 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
That's a clear explanation. I am wondering, though, why some meteorites are corbonaceous, some are rocky, and some are metallic. It looks like there was some differentiation and concentration at some point. Also, the rocky ones are made of oxide, so at what point did the metals become oxidised? Counting silicon as a metal.
63 posted on 07/03/2003 2:46:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
corbonaceous

carbon, not corbon.

64 posted on 07/03/2003 2:47:53 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
I really hope the mods spend the time to see who it was (again) who destroyed what was a decent thread. In fact, I think it was you who posted late y'day afternoon about how polite it was due to the absence of a couple people. once those 2 or 3 showed up, the thread went Ape, then, when it was Already Losing Steam, it got very gor-y.

Oh looky, Kindergarten-code. How "polite".

65 posted on 07/03/2003 2:48:18 PM PDT by conservababeJen (http://abortiondebate.org/forums)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Sorry but a parsec is not a measure of time but it's a measure of distance.

Time and distance are inextricably linked, are they not? To speak of one to the exclusion of the other is... Well, it's hard to do. At any rate, the Millenium Falcon was a spaceship in a science fiction movie. "Fiction" being the important word.

66 posted on 07/03/2003 2:49:16 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I think that some meteorites are original cosmic dust, others are planetary fragments kicked up by impacts during formation, and still others are fragments kicked up by impacts after formation.

-PJ

67 posted on 07/03/2003 2:50:19 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I'm wondering about the implications for that 'famous' likelihood of life supporting planets in the universe equation ... Any idea of how many stars they've surveyed so far to come up with this first one that fits most closely to our own arrangement?... Out of the assumed number of stars in the universe, is the Drake equation going up or down in likelihoods?
68 posted on 07/03/2003 2:53:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Van Flandern was on Coast this week with his exploding planet hypothesis. The asteroids and the other pieces that we see as meteorites seem to have been part of a planet that broke apart. It's an old idea, except for the part where Mars was a moon of this exploded planet. Perhaps this exploded planet was a gas giant, too, and all that is left is pieces of the rocky core. It's at the distance-from-the-sun junction where rocky planets and gas giants meet.
69 posted on 07/03/2003 2:55:58 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Sorry but a parsec is not a measure of time but it's a measure of distance. 1 parsec = 3.26 lightyears or 19,200,000,000,000 miles.

That's what they told George Lukas, but he's a lot richer than either of us.

70 posted on 07/03/2003 2:58:12 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
how many stars they've surveyed so far

Their data is pretty good out to about 50 lightyears. Special circumstances let them see planetary systems farther out. There are about 101 known planetary systems found so far, and 20% or so have at least 2 known planets. They've just begun the search, 7 planets were identified last week. There will be a lot more, no doubt.

71 posted on 07/03/2003 2:58:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Why? Honestly, I don't know.

Because, I rather suspect, the game is effective propaganda, not argumentation. They try to trash threads that make good propaganda for evolution. They stay marginally polite on threads that feature dense, legitimate-looking creation science early on.

72 posted on 07/03/2003 3:10:40 PM PDT by donh (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: donh
two lies just makes two lies

nothing more

(see tag)
73 posted on 07/03/2003 3:12:26 PM PDT by ALS ("this is a book which contains the basis of natural history for our views" Marx on Origin of Species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ALS
btw - does evolution further or support conservatism?

Out of sheer curiosity, what has evolution to do with this article? And why is evolution a matter of conservative/liberal politics? That's silly. I mean, it either occurred or it didn't. If it occurred does this forever render conservative beliefs invalid? That's nonsense.

74 posted on 07/03/2003 3:16:29 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; Junior; js1138; longshadow
I'm now convinced those certain unnamed few do that to those threads on purpose. Why? Honestly, I don't know. It serves no purpose at all. Then again, the constant Hitler, Stalin, Nazis, Satan, etc garbage is inhumanly annoying as well.

They just bury the evidence when they get backed into a corner - happens more and more frequently.

If the moderators just wanted to stop a (supposed) flame war, they could just lock the thread. That would leave all the good, friendly, pleasant posts available for future reference.

Of course, it would also expose the looneys as the fools they are when they try to rewrite history and anyone could verify who did, and did not, start, or engage in, any supposed "flame war".

That's why they have to erase the evidence of their past perfidy. I guess we have no choice but to live with that for the moment.

75 posted on 07/03/2003 3:18:45 PM PDT by balrog666 (When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
It has as much to do with this thread as the morons that accused me of getting a thread yanked.

Or did you just conveniently miss that?

see post #38
76 posted on 07/03/2003 3:23:27 PM PDT by ALS ("this is a book which contains the basis of natural history for our views" Marx on Origin of Species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
A light year is the time/distance it takes light to travel during one earth year. Unfortunately, I'm not mathematically astute enough to tell you how to calculate the distance light travels in one earth year.
77 posted on 07/03/2003 3:24:50 PM PDT by Wolfstar (If we don't re-elect GWB — a truly great President — we're NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
It would bother me too if I lurked on conservative boards foisting marxist crap on unsuspecting christians/conservatives.

UNLESS, you can show where evolution furthers or supports conservatism.

can you?
78 posted on 07/03/2003 3:24:53 PM PDT by ALS ("this is a book which contains the basis of natural history for our views" Marx on Origin of Species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
what has evolution to do with this article? And why is evolution a matter of conservative/liberal politics?

Good questions. At this time evolution would be of interest in predicting whether there might be earthlike planets in that solar system. Predicting anything beyond that now is pure speculation. Evolution itself as a tool of science or refutation of evolution is of interest to some people, but you would have to ask them why.

79 posted on 07/03/2003 3:26:52 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ALS
see post #38

I saw it. And? What has evolution to do with this article?

80 posted on 07/03/2003 3:28:23 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson