Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Cree
Are they implying that earth like planets may also be orbiting this star?

Following up on the explanations, Jupiter-like planets mark the point where the rocky planets separate from the gaseous planets. The solar system forms when gas and dust begin to swirl and rotate. As the dust molecules stick to each other, they get denser and begin to attract each other. The heavier ones fall to the center of the dust cloud and begin to form the star. Others clump together at various orbital distances relative to their mass and become the basis for the planets. Once the density of the protostar reaches the point of ignition, the star "lights up" and the explosion blows away all the loose dust, leaving the rocky clumps to become the planets (the dust is pushed to the outer limits, probably becoming the Oort Cloud that births comets). The clumps further away become the gas giants, like Jupiter. The "no man's land" between the rocky planets and the gas giants would be like the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

If a Jupiter-like planet were to have an elliptical orbit, it would sweep up all the inner dust, preventing the inner rocky planets from forming. A circular orbit would allow other circular-orbiting planets to form. That is why a Jupiter-like planet around a star is a promising sign.

-PJ

(I hope I got that right to a layman's degree of accuracy)

62 posted on 07/03/2003 2:39:38 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too
That's a clear explanation. I am wondering, though, why some meteorites are corbonaceous, some are rocky, and some are metallic. It looks like there was some differentiation and concentration at some point. Also, the rocky ones are made of oxide, so at what point did the metals become oxidised? Counting silicon as a metal.
63 posted on 07/03/2003 2:46:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
I'm wondering about the implications for that 'famous' likelihood of life supporting planets in the universe equation ... Any idea of how many stars they've surveyed so far to come up with this first one that fits most closely to our own arrangement?... Out of the assumed number of stars in the universe, is the Drake equation going up or down in likelihoods?
68 posted on 07/03/2003 2:53:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson