Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chairman of Senate Intelligence Committee: News will break on Saddam's weapons program
Drudge Report ^ | 07/03/03 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 07/03/2003 9:00:32 AM PDT by Pokey78

The Bush administration and the U.S. intelligence community have had some success in finding Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, Sen. Pat Roberts said Thursday.

Roberts, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters on a telephone conference call that he couldn't go into detail because the news is classified.

``It's classified information now _ I am urging the administration and the intelligence community to make at least portions of that public,'' Roberts said. ``We've had some success; I'm sorry I can't go into detail about that.''

Roberts, R-Kan., traveled this week to Iraq and the Middle East with members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; intelligence; iraq; patroberts; roberts; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-191 next last
To: Howlin
In case you missed it.


The democrats stepped in a pile of camel dung? Is that it?
61 posted on 07/03/2003 10:13:41 AM PDT by deport ( BUSH/CHENEY 2004......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: deport
You really have a way with words. :-)
62 posted on 07/03/2003 10:16:56 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Gallagher ran brief interviews on the street. The people on the street have better sense about Iraq and the current aftermath (only 2 months after the march to Bagdad) than the newsmediaites seem to have. One lady even called "them" "idiots". LOL.

The media is always behind the ball

Did she really day that .. Reminds of the time when Peter Jennings went out on the street to ask what the people thought .. LOL

63 posted on 07/03/2003 10:18:00 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Color me skeptical, I have heard this "we found them and we are just letting everyone bash us to make the look worse" arguement before, but then there are still not weapons. What is the logic in purposefully letting this drag out so long, I don't see it.

I agree. We haven't found the WMDs yet or it would be leaked like crazy. I have no doubt they will be found eventually. I just hope we don't find them after they've rained down on one of our bases in Iraq. How hard would it be for some Saddamites to roll a hidden artillery piece out of a warehouse and lob shells into one of our bases???

Most people assume that the WMDs aren't a threat anymore, I don't. Until they're found and destroyed, they are still a threat - both in Iraq and cities here.

64 posted on 07/03/2003 10:21:51 AM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Gallagher's report was rather scathing of the liberal media. I was surprised as how "specific" it was--and naming several newspapers and networks by name.

I am hoping the video or a transcript of the report will show up on FoxNews.com -- it would be a keeper, for sure.
65 posted on 07/03/2003 10:24:59 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: arichtaxpayer
Kakkate koi!!! (Japanese for "Bring it On")
66 posted on 07/03/2003 10:30:17 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Folks, I am NOT in Tokyo right now. So please don't worry about me being nuked by N. Korea. Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Demonrats, get ready for one hellacious smackdown.
67 posted on 07/03/2003 10:31:19 AM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Then don't pass any of this information to Patrick Leahy.

He could very well be one of the main reasons nobody "knows" anything yet.

68 posted on 07/03/2003 10:32:17 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Isn't Hellary on the Intelligence Committee now?
69 posted on 07/03/2003 10:34:27 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No political reason. Tell me. how much information does your local police give out when investigating a crime ?

Apples and oranges. If you want to tie it to crime, WMD are like the missing body. If they release that they have it, the only thing that could happen is that they get confessions for more bodies in order to get some clemency.

I don't know a police Dept that hides the fact that they found a missing person's body.

70 posted on 07/03/2003 10:36:05 AM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Governor McClintock in '03!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
A 'Clean Sweep' takes time.

(Soaping up first........)

:-)

71 posted on 07/03/2003 10:36:21 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Good lord.........I do not know!
72 posted on 07/03/2003 10:37:31 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
What is the logic in purposefully letting this drag out so long, I don't see it.

The 2004 election is the reason.

73 posted on 07/03/2003 10:38:06 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
how long would you expect the RATS to drag it out if nothing is released, hmmmm?
74 posted on 07/03/2003 10:39:17 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
if nothing is released

Who is the keeper of this information? Not the DNC. Hillary might be on the Intelligence Committee, but she doesn't have the power of the executive office. And, she has been really quiet about WMD. I think that is extremelly significant. She is probably gleefuly watching Kerry, Dean, etc hanging themselves, so that she can swoop in, as the savior of the democratic party.

75 posted on 07/03/2003 10:43:30 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"Yeeez I said bimbs"

You owe me a new keyboard buddy. LOL!

76 posted on 07/03/2003 10:44:26 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin
I think you are thinking of the Armed Services Committee sh recently go appointed to....

Intelligence Committee...


MEMBERSHIP

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Pat Roberts, Kansas
Chairman
John D. Rockefeller IV
West Virginia, Vice Chairman
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Carl Levin, Michigan
Mike Dewine, Ohio Dianne Feinstein, California
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Ron Wyden, Oregon
Trent Lott, Mississippi Richard J. Durbin, Illinois
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine Evan Bayh, Indiana
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska John Edwards, North Carolina
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland
John W. Warner, Virginia

77 posted on 07/03/2003 10:45:19 AM PDT by deport ( BUSH/CHENEY 2004......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: deport; epluribus_2
I stand corrected.
78 posted on 07/03/2003 10:46:50 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
My mistake .. she's not on it .. but it's still not a good list



MEMBERSHIP

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

Pat Roberts, Kansas
Chairman
John D. Rockefeller IV
West Virginia, Vice Chairman
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Carl Levin, Michigan
Mike Dewine, Ohio Dianne Feinstein, California
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Ron Wyden, Oregon
Trent Lott, Mississippi Richard J. Durbin, Illinois
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine Evan Bayh, Indiana
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska John Edwards, North Carolina
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland
John W. Warner, Virginia

79 posted on 07/03/2003 10:48:16 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This is called in political circles - BAIT

The plan goes like this.
1) Have some relevant information
2) Leak from some well placed sources
3) Get you opponents whipped up into a frenzy calling for the release of the details
4) Get the press to start thinking there is blood in the water
5) What till the calls get louder
6) Drop the bomb (release the information)
7) Watch the Demorats scurry away in disarray

80 posted on 07/03/2003 10:49:09 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson