Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grateful for Patriot Acts
Jewish World Review ^ | 07/02/2003 | Michele Malkin

Posted on 07/02/2003 8:00:07 PM PDT by rube

Grateful for patriot acts

To civil-liberties alarmists, Viet Dinh is a traitor. To me, he is an American hero.

Dinh, 35, is widely known-and reviled-as the primary architect of the Patriot Act. Until May, he was an Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy in John Ashcroft's Justice Department. (He stepped down to return to his law school post at Georgetown University.) Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Dinh told the Christian Science Monitor, "our nation's ability to defend itself against terror has been not only my vocation but my obsession."

This Fourth of July holiday, I will give thanks for those like Dinh who have worked tirelessly to ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, and secure the blessings of liberty that no other country in the world can match.

A constitutional law expert, Dinh's office had been mostly concerned with judicial nominations before Sept. 11. After the mass murder of 3,000 men, women, and children on American soil, Dinh became an instrumental member of the brain trust that designed the Bush administration's anti-terrorism policies. Most importantly, the Patriot Act revised outdated rules that fatally hampered surveillance of suspected terrorists in America. Dinh also helped craft plans to monitor the entry and exit of foreign students and to register and track non-immigrant visitors from high-risk Middle Eastern countries.

An immigrant himself who escaped from communist Vietnam a quarter-century ago aboard a rickety boat, Dinh notes that foreign visitors to our shores are guests obligated to obey the laws-some which "have not been enforced for 50 years." It was time, Dinh and his colleagues decided, to start enforcing them.

(Excerpt) Read more at NewsAndOpinion.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: freedom; michelemalkin; patriotact; security; terrorism
Michele does it again. She's thought provoking.

As we look forward to the July 4th extended weekend with its barbeques and fireworks, I wonder if we can put aside our lifestyles and think about the defense of our liberties?

1 posted on 07/02/2003 8:00:07 PM PDT by rube
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rube
She is wrong on this one. And the article fails to connect the Patriot Act with arrests of terrorists. The FBI is just doing what they should ahve done before 9/11.

If the FBI and INS had been paying attention to young Arab mens' immigration status before 9/11 - no need for a Patriot Act - at least one fewer plane would have been hijacked.

We are now only a little safer, and significantly less free.
2 posted on 07/02/2003 8:10:16 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rube
Bullsh-t. What the PATRIOT act actually does is clamp down on the privacy of ordinary citizens, which the Supreme Court just declared as a 'right.'

So if you're a guy buggering another guy in your house it's okay...just don't be counting out $5500 in 20s in your house because you will have been reported to the Feds by your bank, and they could now be watching you and tapping your phones without telling you. They could be eavesdropping on you without a warrant. Eventually they can arrest you and hold you without charging you with a crime.

I find it interesting that someone who lived through such a brutal regime would be so instrumental in the creation of another one.

This Fourth of July I will spend a lot of time lamenting the demise of this Republic.

3 posted on 07/02/2003 8:11:55 PM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rube
I think we need to remember there's trade-off in the battle for security. We may have to sacrifice a little of our (admittedly copious) freedom. Because what use use is liberty if you're shackled to a communist/islamic torturing device? None, of course. So yes: Liberty - but not too much.

After all... who wants to die in a terrorist attack?
4 posted on 07/02/2003 8:17:13 PM PDT by ekelly5 (With Jesus' Love We Shall Prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModernDayCato
Bullsh-t....

I agree. A quote I have on my personal website from Southack, at my Free Republic link, states this:

"On the path towards the Rule of Men and away from the tranquility of the Rule of Law, the historical trap has been for good citizens to call upon stricter and stricter government, followed by stronger and stronger government, until government itself becomes so overbearing that it becomes more of the enemy than the anarchy from the Rule of Men.

As the olde maps used to cite: 'Here there be dragons.'" ~ Southack

Four decades of liberalism, multiculturalism, etc., concluding with the Clinton administartion has brought us to where we are. Now we deal with the dragons.

5 posted on 07/02/2003 8:20:14 PM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rube
That makes two critical issues that Michelle Malkin and I basically agree on. And on this one she actually gives PresBush some credit. May be she's not as bad as I thought she was. Then again...
6 posted on 07/02/2003 8:22:17 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salem
Unfortunately our president is not on our side, regardless of what he says. 'You will know them by their fruits.' PATRIOT is one of his fruits.
7 posted on 07/02/2003 8:28:30 PM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ekelly5
"After all... who wants to die in a terrorist attack?"

Exodus 22:2 "If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into a house and is killed in the process, the person who killed the thief is not guilty."

That's why you burn them first.

Liberty - but not too much? How much is "too much"?

You haven't been around here long, huh? Today? July 3?

8 posted on 07/02/2003 8:49:02 PM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ekelly5
Did we have "too much" liberty? Less liberty is good?
9 posted on 07/02/2003 8:59:16 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rube
Nice article, and one that a few of us agree with.
I am thankful for the fact that this administration is at least trying to make us more secure.
Freedom isn't free.
10 posted on 07/02/2003 9:08:23 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
All of the results listed in Malkin's column could have have been achieved within the existing legal framework without adding two hundred pages of new legislation, a new cabinet-level department, and an army of hangers-on to staff it.

The FBI and CIA already had the tools to get the job done. We have given more powers without demanding accountability for existing powers.

That is bad government all the way round.

11 posted on 07/02/2003 9:17:03 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry

The Patiot act(s) need to sunset or never get enacted.

This bad paper gives way too much power without accountability. Apparently it wasn't enough...Hence son of Patriot, the immortal act that forever removes more rights.

I'd rather the FBI get a legal warrant from a Kangaroo judge rather than them deciding who they suspect of anything and hence can tap. Before PA, someone could be held accountable for unfounded invasion of privacy. Now, it doesn't take much to set off red flags and it all goes behind a wall of silence.
12 posted on 07/02/2003 10:32:34 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
All of the results listed in Malkin's column could have have been achieved within the existing legal framework without adding two hundred pages of new legislation, a new cabinet-level department, and an army of hangers-on to staff it. The FBI and CIA already had the tools to get the job done. We have given more powers without demanding accountability for existing powers. That is bad government all the way round.

Holy crap! For once I agree with you 100%. Sign of the apocolypse? :-)

Have a great holiday.

13 posted on 07/03/2003 8:05:45 AM PDT by jmc813 (The FR Big Brother 4 thread - Coming later today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson