[garbanzo]

I didn't bring up colonial law as a substantive argument for policy in 2003. Of course you can bring up all sorts of colonial laws that we moderns have thrown out - I'm not exactly sure what the relevance is to now.

[wasp69]

I didn't bring up colonial law as a substantive argument for policy in 2003. Of course you can bring up all sorts of colonial laws that we moderns have thrown out - I'm not exactly sure what the relevance is to now.

Well then why bring it up at all? What you posted sounded like some kind of cheap shot and is the type of "education" that I constantly battle in the schools my children go to. If it is not relevant, why throw it into the mix?

[Elsie]

I'm not exactly sure what the relevance is to now.

I'm sure that the relevance is how TEMPORARY man's laws seem to be.

---

Remember, it was just about 20 years ago the the Supremes ruled the OTHER way on homos...