You talk of me having a short memory.
I won't bore you with all the lies, but here is one by Chaney:
"At the time, CIA analysts were involved in a knock-down, drag-out argument with the Pentagon on this very point. Most of the nuclear engineers at the CIA, and virtually all scientists at U.S. government laboratories and the International Atomic Energy Agency, found no reliable evidence that Iraq had restarted its nuclear weapons program."
And of course, lets not forget Bush lying about the WMD.
You know, I'd be willing to bet that the surviving Branch Davidians, Elian Gonzales and the people who lost sons and brothers and husbands in Mogadishu would be able to tell the difference between the Toon and Dubya.
I'm sure they would too, and I'm sure they would be able to tell you that Bush and Cheney lied to America. Most idiots can figure that out.
How in the world did you forget the Toon's nightmarish presidency already? How in the world did you forget the 3,000 dead his incompetence and negligence cost us less than two short years ago?
I have not. Do 3,000 dead Americans give the President the right to lie to the other 291,403,064 Americans? I don't think so.
I won't bore you with all the lies, but here is one by Chaney:
No, that wouldn't necessarily bore me, maybe you write fiction well. Ahhh, so of course we come back to the main problem every one of you Bush-bashers seem to have with him in the end: The "Why can't we just wall ourselves in and pretend the rest of the world doesn't exist" whining. It always comes back to the "unjustified" war which the administration has "lied" about. BTW, what's your source for the CIA quote? Have you noticed that the Cheney speech was offered at a time when the CIA and Brit Intel were certain that there were efforts to obtain uranium? Therefore, Cheney might have been conveying a mistaken assessment, but it was not a lie. Note that this leaves aside all the numerous indications that Iraq was working on uranium enrichment. How does the possession of 3,000 pages of detailed uranium enrichment instructions by Iraqi nuclear scientitsts not indicate something was up? How about all those pieces of "dual use" equipment that was machined for specs that would be silly for anything other than enrichment use, i.e., "rocket body tubes" machined down to extremely fine tolereances? What were they going to do with the enriched uranium, put in in their coffee? As for other "lies" about WMD, how come you folks never have an answer for all those intercepts where Iraqi muckity-mucks were overheard telling their underlings to hide the nerve gas, etc.? Guess Saddam was just having a "hide the imaginary weapons drill" just in case he someday decided to produce some WMD. Maybe right after that all the Iraqi generals held tea parties with their teddy bears and imaginary playmates.
I'm sure they would too, and I'm sure they would be able to tell you that Bush and Cheney lied to America. Most idiots can figure that out.
Well then, quit throwing the elephant and offer some evidence. But also, if you really believe there is no difference in character between the Clintons and the Bush administration, please go to some other nation (Mexico might be good) where your morally blind assessments of universal corruption will be accurate.
BTW, did you vote for Clintoon or Perot in '92 because you thought Dubya's dad was too liberal?