I won't bore you with all the lies, but here is one by Chaney:
No, that wouldn't necessarily bore me, maybe you write fiction well. Ahhh, so of course we come back to the main problem every one of you Bush-bashers seem to have with him in the end: The "Why can't we just wall ourselves in and pretend the rest of the world doesn't exist" whining. It always comes back to the "unjustified" war which the administration has "lied" about. BTW, what's your source for the CIA quote? Have you noticed that the Cheney speech was offered at a time when the CIA and Brit Intel were certain that there were efforts to obtain uranium? Therefore, Cheney might have been conveying a mistaken assessment, but it was not a lie. Note that this leaves aside all the numerous indications that Iraq was working on uranium enrichment. How does the possession of 3,000 pages of detailed uranium enrichment instructions by Iraqi nuclear scientitsts not indicate something was up? How about all those pieces of "dual use" equipment that was machined for specs that would be silly for anything other than enrichment use, i.e., "rocket body tubes" machined down to extremely fine tolereances? What were they going to do with the enriched uranium, put in in their coffee? As for other "lies" about WMD, how come you folks never have an answer for all those intercepts where Iraqi muckity-mucks were overheard telling their underlings to hide the nerve gas, etc.? Guess Saddam was just having a "hide the imaginary weapons drill" just in case he someday decided to produce some WMD. Maybe right after that all the Iraqi generals held tea parties with their teddy bears and imaginary playmates.
I'm sure they would too, and I'm sure they would be able to tell you that Bush and Cheney lied to America. Most idiots can figure that out.
Well then, quit throwing the elephant and offer some evidence. But also, if you really believe there is no difference in character between the Clintons and the Bush administration, please go to some other nation (Mexico might be good) where your morally blind assessments of universal corruption will be accurate.
BTW, did you vote for Clintoon or Perot in '92 because you thought Dubya's dad was too liberal?
I guess it all depends on what your definition of "is" is.