Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US threatens sanctions over ICC
BBC News Online ^ | July 01 2003

Posted on 07/01/2003 10:05:37 AM PDT by knighthawk

Dozens of countries face the loss of United States military aid, because they have not met a Tuesday deadline to grant American soldiers immunity from prosecution for war crimes, the US says.

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the protection of US citizens from the threat of being hauled before the new International Criminal Court (ICC) was a significant matter in relations with other countries.

The US does not recognise the ICC, saying its forces could be subjected to politically-motivated prosecution.

The court, based in The Hague in the Netherlands, can try individuals for war crimes committed after 1 July anywhere in the world.

Washington has concluded bilateral agreements with more than 50 nations to secure exemption for US troops.

Balance

Nato members and other key allies - such as Israel, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand - are exempt from any penalty if they refuse.

Others face cuts in military aid, under the American Service members Protection Act approved last year by the US Congress.

However Mr Boucher said the US administration might waive the aid suspension for countries regarded as crucial to Washington's strategic interests.

"In implementing the act, we'll need to balance our broader bilateral interests with substantial consideration to the risk posed to US citizens... by the potential for politically motivated charges," he said.

Mr Boucher declined to identify the countries that would be exempt from cuts in military aid.

For those facing sanctions, he added, the cuts will not be immediate.

"But it's an important issue that will take hold over time," Mr Boucher said.

Balkans dilemma

The BBC's Gabriel Partos says that the American demand for immunity from war-crimes prosecution has created a particular dilemma in the Balkans.

South-east European countries welcome Washington's military aid, but are also under pressure from the EU - a strong backer of the ICC - not to conclude immunity deals.

Croatia, a EU candidate state, has refused to sign such an agreement for the time being.

Others, including Romania, Albania, and Bosnia-Hercegovina, have granted immunity to US forces.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: icc; richardboucher; sanctions; un

1 posted on 07/01/2003 10:05:38 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/01/2003 10:05:53 AM PDT by knighthawk (We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Why exempt NATO "allies"? They are the ones most likely to try to arrest Americans.
3 posted on 07/01/2003 10:08:33 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I have an idea. How 'bout a law that says: "If you arrest and/or detain American citizens we will take them back by force and raze the ICC buildings to the ground.
4 posted on 07/01/2003 10:11:47 AM PDT by jjm2111 (I'm a psychopatriot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Appearently there is such a law. It's called the 'Hague invasion act'. It was a big deal in the Netherlands, because if there were American soldiers being held in The Hague at the ICC the US would take them back with force.

http://www.google.nl/search?q=hague+invasion+icc&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=nl&lr=
5 posted on 07/01/2003 10:15:06 AM PDT by knighthawk (We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Wow, Jesse Helms and Tom Delay thought my idea was a good one. I give them a lot of credit.

I'm not one of this site's Bush Worshippers, but didn't the President pull us out of the ICC?
6 posted on 07/01/2003 10:21:41 AM PDT by jjm2111 (I'm a psychopatriot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Romania's immunity agreement failed to secure ratification in parliament, and has been scrapped..
7 posted on 07/01/2003 10:54:39 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Why exempt NATO "allies"? They are the ones most likely to try to arrest Americans.

The first reason is because not a single one of them has concluded or is likely to conclude an agreement. The second is because NATO by definition would cease to exist if we halted military cooperation with them...

8 posted on 07/01/2003 10:56:14 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson