Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshe
ok your list is good, and i agree Bush has done good things, but allow me to add a few 'cons'

Federal spending during the years 2000 - 2003 more than any other time in US history save for WWII
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/BG1581.cfm
http://www.cato.org/research/articles/dehaven-030326.html

The PATRIOT Act

Detention of US Citizens without charges or representation, suspected terrorists or not, if they are US citizens, they are protected by the constitution.
Jose Padilla

Most Federal Education Spending in Decades, Bush partnered with Ted Kennedy for this one
http://www.cato.org/current/school-choice/pubs/lartigue-020301.html

That Ugly Farm Bill
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Agriculture/BG1534.cfm

Extention of Unemployment

Pressed for Tax-cuts for those that don't pay taxes

Federalization of Airport security under the TSA

Huge new cabinet agency, Homeland Security

Supports(publicly) Assault Weapons Ban

His record of Growing Government in texas.
This is important because it shows his penchant for spending and big government.
81 posted on 07/01/2003 9:55:09 AM PDT by rattrap (Looters and Moochers and Zealots, OH MY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rattrap
Did you read this part of my post:

Items still to be accomplished and/or addressed

Allow sunsetting of AWB

Fix illegal immigration issues and border control

Limit/eliminate federal entitlement programs

Cut size of federal budget

Shrink federal government job force

Hate all Dems and do not treat them civilly

Don't appoint any homosexuals to public office

Don't meet with Grover Norquist--or Muslims--or Homosexuals

Kill all terrorists in Israel

Drop the idea of a Palestinian state

"Eliminate" all Palestinians

Need means testing on Senior Rx legislation

Get the United States out of the United Nations

Banish the United Nations from U.S. soil.

Stop all foreign aid.

Stop all foreign aid to the Palestinians

Eliminate Steel and Wood tarrifs

Talk non-stop, at every opportunity, about judicial nominees and lack of Senate vote.

Push Frist out.....bring back Trent Lott

Fire Karl Rove

Fire Colin Powell


I have added some of your points to the list...but I doubt there is much that can currently be 'addressed or accomplished' re: the size of government in Texas while he was governor. In other words, it is NOT germaine to this discussion, imo.



92 posted on 07/01/2003 10:05:15 AM PDT by justshe (Educate....not Denigrate !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: rattrap
His record of Growing Government in texas.


Can you list a governor or President that not had government grow under their leadership? How about a Mayor, County Judge?

Short list I'd expect...... tick tock
101 posted on 07/01/2003 10:15:41 AM PDT by deport ( BUSH/CHENEY 2004...... with or without the showboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: rattrap
"Detention of US Citizens without charges or representation, suspected terrorists or not, if they are US citizens, they are protected by the constitution.
Jose Padilla "

That's actually not true in all circumstances.

For instance, prior to WW2 Adolph Hitler put out a call for all true Aryans worldwide to come defend the Fatherland. More than 1,000 American citizens answered his call by going to Germany and enlisting in the Wehrmacht (Army).

But then after Pearl Harbor, Germany declared war on the U.S. There were now American citizens in Germany at war with America herself.

When our soldiers encountered these American citizens, they were shot on sight on the battlefield, or captured and imprisoned as prisoners of war.

But interestingly enough, the Surpreme Court ruled that those American citizens were **NOT** entitled to the protections of the U.S. Constitution. So those "American" POWs were not given attorneys. They could not sue for bail. They could not call witnesses. They were not entitled to trials.

Later, a small group of those Aryan-Americans were brought to the U.S. mainland by a German U-boat to conduct sabatoge. They were dressed in civilian clothes, and they were captured by American police, not military forces.

Again the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that such battlefield combatants, even though some were American citizens, had no civilian rights under the U.S. Constitution. They were given military trials/tribunals, and several (but not all) were executed.

So, can U.S. citizens be detained without trials and without attorneys? Well, the answer, historically at least, has been "yes" if they are battlefield cambatants.

One of the 9/11/01 terrorists was an American citizen, for instance. Certainly there would have been no crime if an innocent American on his hijacked aircraft had executed that particular person without trial, even though the perp in question was a U.S. Citizen.

Nor do we stop battles, either in America or in foreign lands, to give U.S. citizens like Taliban Johnny a trial or an attorney. Such battlefield combatants are dealt with at our convenience, under such rules and procedures as we deem necessary.

The moral to this story is that taking up arms **against** America is a good way to lose your Constitutional protections.

135 posted on 07/01/2003 10:52:20 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson