Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw
The point is, that if four of them chose to leave, the Constitution would have taken effect for the other 9 without them. Wouldn't it have?

The point Madison was making in 1787 was that states should not be compelled to accept the Constitution. If 4 had decided to not accept, so be it, the Union would go on without them. But once they accepted, they were bound to it and could not withdraw without the agreement of the others just as they could not be expelled by the others without their consent.

205 posted on 07/07/2003 10:40:21 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
The point Madison was making in 1787 was that states should not be compelled to accept the Constitution. If 4 had decided to not accept, so be it, the Union would go on without them. But once they accepted, they were bound to it and could not withdraw without the agreement of the others just as they could not be expelled by the others without their consent.

Thats your opinion. But that is not stated explicitly and in fact some States specifically said otherwise in their ratification documents.
208 posted on 07/07/2003 3:35:07 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson