Now’s the Time to Speak up, Stand up, and Fight! . . . so where’s George Bush?

vanity | 6-30-2003 | brianbaldwin

[MEG33]

Piffle

[longtermmemmory]

chenney's daughter is a homosexual.

The proposed federal marriage ammendment:

"Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman."

"Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups."

[alphadog]

"so where’s George Bush?"

to the left of me...

[Pan_Yans Wife]

What does Cheney's daughter have to do with it? Do you think Dick and Lynn Cheney raised her with the plan that she would become a homosexual? How many homosexuals truly receive their parents' blessing, and not just resignation?

[DPB101]

Piffle

Hear! Hear! Cucumber sandwiches all around! What is that Hatter? Where are my cucumbers?

[DPB101]

Do you think Dick and Lynn Cheney raised her with the plan that she would become a homosexual?

Yes. Neocons do this stuff. You can look it up.

[Archangelsk]

No, bad piffle.

[Calpernia]

>>>>But then, some think the universe of this world has to be a nest for ever, that we are never to leave this nest, that simply being in a nest should be the end in itself, and since we are going to sit in this nest forever together, then it’s all about valuing diversity of others, because, you know, we are all stuck in this nest. This is called (modern) liberalism – it’s always totalitarian in the end, e.g. international socialism (Communism) and/or National Socialism (NAZI) et all, e.g. Ted “it’s a beanie Party Boat” Kennedy, Hillary “I was shocked, but who else can make me laugh like Bill?” Clinton, etc..

Yes, that is the EU.

>>>>Under this liberalism, the nest is government. No matter how many are in the nest, and told they cannot leave, the nest itself is just a few, . . . like President Bush's drugs for seniors, for example

No, that is Pres. Bush trying to fix a model that is already in place.

>>>>I think it’s time for non-cooperation. The states, the people, should simply not cooperate anymore. I mean, what difference would it make simply going along with this crap, and this Bush applauding it and all?

Ya think? So...since we aren't already cooperating...and the border states aren't following border security memos...we should blame the power given to the states already on Bush...and give the corrupted states more power, right?

Let's empower more corrupt local govs...that is what gave us Clinton anyway.

Pres. Bush is in an interesting position. He was given power with corrupt politicians. Rules don't change overnight with a memo. States have been empowered already. There is a LARGE clean up that has to occur.

So, why don't you try being part of the solution, rather than, a propaganding problem?

ciao for now. Off for the night.

[alphadog]

"Piffle???"

Is this some French thing?

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Look what up?

That Lynn, while rocking the baby in the cradle looked at Dick and said, "My greatest wish is that she will grow up to be gay?"

Couldn't it simply be that their daughter decided to be gay, is a grown woman, and there isn't much they can do to stop her... except love her, regardless?

[Miss Marple]

Balderdash.

[hole_n_one]

• Buffalo Bush
• Bandaid Mouth Bush
• Bushy Ked-loafers
• Bushies
• check-pants country club Republicans

  You're drunk, aren't you?

[MEG33]

Think you missed the sarcasm.

[UnBlinkingEye]

An off topic question. Do you have a sister named Denise?

[MJY1288]

Maureen Dowd... Is that you?

[MEG33]

See #12

[Howlin]

I’ve even noticed they are starting to take to wearing check-pants so they can join the check-pants country club Republicans)

Utter rubbish.

but there is a big rumble starting to happen, discontent among real conservatives considering what just happened in the last few days, and they are starting to say:

From the commentary today on "Realclearpolitics.com" --

Despite the disagreements many of the narrowly-focused constituencies on the right have with President Bush, there seems to be an overall appreciation of his character, integrity, and his unwavering commitment to U.S. national security. There also seems to be an understanding that Bush, like Reagan, is helping to facilitate a continued shift toward conservatism in U.S. public opinion.

Today, many conservatives say, American public opinion is shifting their way, so there is no reason to be impatient — or to pressure Mr. Bush into doing things before the election that might hurt him next year.

"The Republicans are looking at decades of dominance in the House and the Senate, and having the presidency with some regularity," Mr. Norquist said. "So if this year the tax cut isn't the one we wanted — no biggie. There's a sense that we can afford to wait."

This tolerance of Bush only runs so deep, of course, and if the economy doesn't enjoy a robust recovery the President can't afford to have conservative groups sitting on their hands next November.

Meanwhile, the upside for conservative groups in the coming election is bigger than ever: if the economy does spring back to life and conservatives come out en masse for the President, it could produce a landslide victory and an historic mandate for Bush and his conservative agenda.

[Paradox]

If I were a DUmmy, I'd sure enjoy the hysteria evident here on FR.

Count me in as one of the (few) here that doesn't consider this as the end, or the beginning of the end, of the world. I dont see the nighmares coming true. Things are gonna be alright, more or less..

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Yup... a good sign that I need to sleep.

Best wishes.