Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hundreds of molest cases face review after Supreme Court ruling; two molestation defendants freed
Associated Press ^ | 06-30-03

Posted on 06/30/2003 7:02:16 PM PDT by Brian S

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:52 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

California judges ordered two molestation defendants freed Monday as authorities sought to determine how many cases may be voided by the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of a law that allowed prosecution of decades-old sex abuse allegations.

The ruling was denounced by people who have accused priests of crimes, while prosecutors emphasized that the fallout from the high court's decision will extend far beyond the high-profile clergy sex abuse scandal that has rocked the Roman Catholic church.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: expostfacto; released; scotus; scotuslist; statuteoflimitations

1 posted on 06/30/2003 7:02:17 PM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Looks like we need longer statutes of limitations. Write your congressman and/or your state legislator.
2 posted on 06/30/2003 7:04:46 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Looks like we need longer statutes of limitations. Write your congressman and/or your state legislator.
3 posted on 06/30/2003 7:04:47 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Throwing people in jail based on someone's 30 year-old "recovered memory" just isn't a good idea.
4 posted on 06/30/2003 7:05:01 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
After all the abuse we saw in those day care cases, I have to agree.

Incidently, Janet Reno made her name prosecuting bogus, day-care, child molestation cases.

5 posted on 06/30/2003 7:09:14 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: squidly
I agree we need longer statute of limitations.
6 posted on 06/30/2003 7:12:35 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
Shouldn't there be a special place in hell reserved for lawyers who prosecute in such bogus cases?
7 posted on 06/30/2003 7:14:38 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I read somewhere on freerepublic that one guy affected by this ruling was 72 and prosecuted for a crime he did 50 years ago.
8 posted on 06/30/2003 7:18:20 PM PDT by microgood (They will all die......most of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
There are reasons for statutes of limitations, although sometimes there may be reasons to revise them. But the main point is that it's against the most basic principles of justice to revise a law retroactively. That's what the Florida Supreme Court tried to do in the Gore chad case.
9 posted on 06/30/2003 7:39:20 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The Supreme Court once ruled the Clintonista tax increase elements that were retroactive were OK.
10 posted on 06/30/2003 7:49:35 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Brian S
Decision came out the same day as Lawrence. Makes you wonder.

You also have to wonder how many homosexual molestation cases there are out there like Limon, where the perps would now be free if they had been guilty of heterosexual molestation.

13 posted on 06/30/2003 8:40:01 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

Anybody know what the statute of limitations is for CA?

I would hope at least 10 years. If you have a child that was molested at 5, it isn't unheard of that they don't get over the fear/quilt of telling until they are in their teens...or later.

16 posted on 07/01/2003 7:39:30 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson