Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter Explodes Hollywood's Blacklist Myth
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/30/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 06/30/2003 1:43:31 PM PDT by kattracks

It is one of the most enduring lies created by leftists: that all Hollywood trembled in fear over the persecution allegedly launched against Tinseltown by Sen. Joe McCarthy.

Along with the infamous Hollywood 10, actors, actresses, directors, producers and even the guys who swept the studio floors were allegedly writhing in agony, fearing they’d become victims of McCarthyism, and driven into unemployment and poverty.

There are just a few things wrong with this – to begin with it’s not true, Ann Coulter writes in her best-selling new book, "Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism."

Nowadays, nobody bothers to point out that the phrase "McCarthyism" first appeared in the pages of the Communist Party’s organ in the U.S., the Daily Worker, which got it directly from the bowels of the NKVD’s Moscow headquarters at 3 Dzerzinski Square, where it was coined by the Stalinist disinformation experts in the belief that leftist useful idiots in the U.S. would adopt it as their own. Which of course they did, eagerly, and continue to do so even today.

The hysterical cry of the terrible consequences of blacklisting – of McCarthy depriving honest hardworking Hollywood celebrities of an opportunity to ply their trade, was based on a lie. But as Coulter observes, everything we know about Joe McCarthy is a lie.

The fact is that the so-called blacklisting began when the House Committee on Un-American Activities held hearings to determine the extent of communist penetration of the film industry, which was extensive.

Witnesses known as the Hollywood 10, acting under orders from their communist bosses, refused to admit under oath that they were members of the Communist Party. For this contempt of Congress they went to jail for a brief of time.

The Supreme Court refused to hear their appeals. And these so-called victims of the McCarthyite reign of terror, instead of being deprived of their civil liberties, "had the benefit of legal counsel, trial by jury, and proof beyond a reasonable-doubt standard," Coulter writes. "Still the cosseted, overpampered Hollywood elites were shocked to discover they could be held responsible for anything they did, and vowed that the rest of the country would never hear the end of it.

"At about the same time – under the legal system Communists revered, Stalin executed, starved, exiled or imprisoned more than ten million people."

Coulter writes: "Ten Hollywood scribblers who subscribed to an ideology responsible for the murder by the million refused to admit their membership in the Communist party to a House Committee," which McCarthy had absolutely nothing to do with.

As Coulter repeatedly points out, McCarthy was a senator, not a member of the House of Representatives, where the committee did its work. He concentrated on communist infiltration into the U.S. government, which the evidence from the Venona intercepts now clearly shows to have been massive.

Recoiling in fear of being labeled employers of traitors, courageous Hollywood film moguls canned all 10 and refused to use them, at least not under their real names. As a result some of them were simply allowed to work under false names and kept on writing films and getting well paid.

Over and over we are told that the so-called blacklist created a reign of terror in Tinseltown, with everybody in filmdom cringing in fear.

Couler reveals the terrible exile endured by one of the blacklistees: Norma Barzman, who was forced to flee not to Devil’s Island, but instead to gay Paree, where, in her own words, she suffered such grievous punishment as having "dinner with Picasso every Tuesday night when we were at our country house in Provence. Yves Montand and Simone Signoret, Jacques Prevert were our friends. Plus we got to work with all the amazing European directors including Vittorio De Sica and Constantin Costa-Gavras. It was hard, but was also the time of my life."

Oh, the horrors of it all!

"Meanwhile," Coulter notes, "back in the country they preferred [the U.S.S.R.], people were being whisked off to Soviet gulags in the dead of night. They were being sentenced to work in forced labor camps. They were sent to Siberia for five years. They were being shot execution-style after being forced to confess to absurd diabolical conspiracies."

But there was a real Hollywood blacklist you never hear leftists talking about. As NewsMax.com reported in The Left’s Lies That Never Die, conservative anti-communists in Hollywood were denied work because of their beliefs. Men such as Bruce Cabot, Ward Bond, Adolph Menjou and many other members of John Wayne’s anti-communist Motion Picture Alliances were blacklisted and found work only in Wayne’s movies.

In "Treason" Ann Coulter proves her point again and again: Everything you think you know about Joe McCarthy is a lie.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Media Bias



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blacklist; coulter; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2003 1:43:32 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
placemarker
2 posted on 06/30/2003 1:48:04 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The book is a real eyeopener. I was up quite late last night reading it. It makes the events of the last 60 years much clearer and very easy to understand, once you see how the libs have been working their lies.
3 posted on 06/30/2003 1:51:55 PM PDT by Big Mack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
My favorite line in her book is when she quotes Reagan as saying......

"Detante' is what a farmer has with his Turkey until Thanksgiving Day"

4 posted on 06/30/2003 1:51:57 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Gifted One is Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Mack
I agree 100%, plus she has plenty of jabs at the liberals to go along with her facts about their treasonous history. A great book, I couldn't put it down
5 posted on 06/30/2003 1:53:36 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Gifted One is Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Nowadays, nobody bothers to point out that the phrase "McCarthyism" first appeared in the pages of the Communist Party’s organ in the U.S., the Daily Worker, which got it directly from the bowels of the NKVD’s Moscow headquarters at 3 Dzerzinski Square, where it was coined by the Stalinist disinformation experts in the belief that leftist useful idiots in the U.S. would adopt it as their own. Which of course they did, eagerly, and continue to do so even today.

I thought the first use of "McCarthyism" was in a NY Times political cartoon on March 29, 1950:


6 posted on 06/30/2003 2:14:32 PM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump for later
7 posted on 06/30/2003 2:15:31 PM PDT by Chuckster ("If honor were profitable, everybody would be honorable." Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare
Sorry, that's a Washington Post cartoon.
8 posted on 06/30/2003 2:20:17 PM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Your Nightmare
And when and who did the cartoonist get his "inspiration" from? (Wouldn't you have to establish that Red Square sent its' "public" warning after the cartoon ?)
10 posted on 06/30/2003 2:22:42 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
And when and who did the cartoonist get his "inspiration" from? (Wouldn't you have to establish that Red Square sent its' "public" warning after the cartoon ?)

What "public warning"?

Herb Block was interviewed by Brian Lamb on 14th November, 1993.

Brian Lamb: Here's a cartoon from the year 1950 -- The headline on it is, "You mean I'm supposed to stand on that?" And right up here is the word "McCarthyism." Did you invent that?

Herb Block: That's the first use of that word that I know of and I remember how it originated because I wanted to put something on that tar barrel and you couldn't call it McCarthy himself, and you wouldn't say McCarthy techniques or so on and I thought, "Well, maybe just use one word, McCarthyism," and, you know, it caught on.

11 posted on 06/30/2003 2:29:16 PM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jerky
"Why should these people have been required to tell Congress whether they were Democrat, Republican, Nazi or Communist?"

I would presume because they were under oath to tell the truth. I could be wrong.

12 posted on 06/30/2003 2:33:28 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Joe McCarthy was right, but he was the wrong man to lead the charge. Bob Taft should have been the leader, but Taft was a man of the upper class, and I don't think he wanted to believe that many of his friends were traitors to the United States. McCarthy was just an ordinary slob who seized the issue and ran with it, but he finally ran into the Army. Eisenhower could not accept that the Army had been penetrated by communist agents, so it was he who broke McCarthy.
13 posted on 06/30/2003 2:43:50 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
It was sort of like obstruction of justice. The Communist Party had been outlawed and Congress was investigating illegal activites.
14 posted on 06/30/2003 2:47:19 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Witnesses known as the Hollywood 10, acting under orders from their communist bosses, refused to admit under oath that they were members of the Communist Party. For this contempt of Congress they went to jail for a brief of time.

If memory serves, all, or most, of the ten had been part of the Federal Writers' Project, which was part of the WPA (Work Progress Admin.). This program was a federally funded "make work" program for unemployed writers during the Depression.

Thus, the taxpayers had directly paid these communists to write their Soviet propaganda.

16 posted on 06/30/2003 2:50:26 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BUSHED
Let's see, you claim your Uncle was blacklisted...got any documentation on that? The problem with people like you is, when facts are presented, you run to your hole and resort to personal attacks. Back up your b.s. with proof, as Coulter has, or go back to DUmbass.
17 posted on 06/30/2003 2:51:19 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BUSHED
Who is your uncle, and how was his life ruined?
18 posted on 06/30/2003 2:56:32 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS; BUSHED
I really wish the admin moderator wouldn't delete posts like that. I would have liked to see if BUSHED had the cajones to stand behind his statements (name-calling, actually).
19 posted on 06/30/2003 2:58:05 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jerky
Why should these people have been required to tell Congress whether they were Democrat, Republican, Nazi or Communist?

You ask that question, I assume to point out that their constitutional rights may have been violated. I am just using a bit of common sense here, since I am neither an attorney or an expert on the Constitution, but:

If the announced purpose of a group was to overthrow the US government and any member of that group was sworn to work towards achieving that purpose. Then would that person not have entered into a conspiracy to commit treason and thus would have committed a criminal act?

Does the government not have a right to investigate a group, which proposes to take over the country, by methods which are outside of the legal means to do so?

20 posted on 06/30/2003 2:59:23 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("Torn between half truths and vicitimization, fighting back with counter attacks" - V. Morrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson