To: MineralMan
My error. Since the woman was not killed, but only injured, there was no homicide. Reckless Endangerment sounds like the appropriate charge.
I hope the woman recovers fully from her leg wound. Were I her husband, the weapon involved would never fire again, and it would be unlikely that the boys would feel like doing target practice for a long, long time. You wouldn't shoot my wife, accidentally or intentionally, without paying a steep price.
27 posted on
06/30/2003 12:09:26 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
Maybe, maybe not. Most likely the woman was hit by a ricochet.
49 posted on
06/30/2003 1:16:41 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: MineralMan
Were I her husband, the weapon involved would never fire again, You could blame the tractor for placing them in the line of fire. I wonder how long it would take to cut up a tractor? I think they have those crushers at junkyards that could do it. Maybe they could raffle a chance to hit it with a sledgehammer.
52 posted on
06/30/2003 1:21:59 PM PDT by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: MineralMan
"You wouldn't shoot my wife, accidentally or intentionally, without paying a steep price."
Unfortunately, these things are always left up for the courts to decide...
To: MineralMan
So you'd go beat up a couple of kids for accidentally shooting your wife? Heh. They'd do more to you than they will the kids.
69 posted on
06/30/2003 5:19:04 PM PDT by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson