Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Common Tator
Many of us know your position on this issue. It so happens, we're in agreement on this one. Yes, the Constitution is whatever a sitting SC says it is, at a certain time. Fine. Thanks for pointing out the obvious, once again.

In the here and now, however, I still want PresBush to nominate the best qualified conservative jurists around. The more conservatives on the high court, the better chance the Constitution will be followed, as originally intented by the Founding Fathers.

>>>Anyone who thinks the words in the Constitution have any bearing on court rulings, has not studied the last 198 years of court decisions.

One problem. I find this remark, somewhat of a contradiction when viewed in the context of your entire statement.

34 posted on 06/30/2003 9:31:55 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
I am with you 100% -- want the best conservative jurist that President Bush can find and have the Senate go to the mat for that person. I believe in my heart that Pres Bush would NEVER appoint a moderate as even his Dad says that the Souter choice was the worst choice he could have made for SCOTUS!
40 posted on 06/30/2003 10:01:02 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson