To: mrobison
What point is there in that? The Supreme Court will simply invalidate it. They are not bound by the Constitution. It's their opinion that is important, as far as they are concerned.
A better move would be to appoint justices who would simply announce that from now on, gay marriage is unconstitutional. That's how we amend the Constitution in the 21st Century.
To: Brilliant
What point is there in that? The Supreme Court will simply invalidate it. They are not bound by the Constitution. It's their opinion that is important, as far as they are concerned.
The Supreme Court CAN NOT invalidate a Constitutional Amendment. An amendment becomes part of the constitution by definition. The court is bound to uphold it against all challenges and CAN NOT invalidate it in any way.
28 posted on
06/29/2003 6:33:11 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Brilliant
You think the Supreme Court would declare the Constitution to be unconstitutional?
I guess it could happen.
199 posted on
06/29/2003 8:09:56 PM PDT by
Republican Wildcat
(Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson