Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus
Especially what a man or a woman are (probably in terms of born genital phenotype). I agree 100%. Let there be no wiggle room for the "living Constitution" crowd.

Oh good.... Now you want our constitution talking about genitalia.

142 posted on 06/29/2003 7:49:12 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog
Well the SCOTUS has been ******* around with it for years.
146 posted on 06/29/2003 7:50:00 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: HairOfTheDog
Oh good.... Now you want our constitution talking about genitalia.

Perhaps you didn't notice, but the Supreme Court of the United States was discussing anal sex the other day. This sick nonsense has been foisted on us quite against our will. Are we not supposed to fight the battle just to keep talk of "genitals" out of the constitution? Of all the idiotic arguments....
220 posted on 06/29/2003 8:18:15 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson