Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America: Land of the Fat
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | June 29, 2003 | Jim Ritter

Posted on 06/29/2003 5:42:00 PM PDT by SamAdams76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: wardaddy
You can eat a no fat diet loaded with carbs and reach whale proportions.

While I agree with this statement it still comes down to calories.

I've been on both low fat and low carb and lost weight both ways. The one constant was calories.

21 posted on 06/29/2003 6:09:57 PM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
It's not the meat in our diets but the sugar and gross amounts of starch that has been accepted by nutritionists over the last few decades.

A bowl of beans and rice is 1 gram of fat but a whopping 60 grams of carbohydrates for example. One ear of sweet corn can go over 20 grams of carbs, wash it down with a bottle of root beer and that's another 54 grams of carbs.

One is allowed over 250 grams of carbohydrates by current government guidlines. That is excessive and most people go way over that. The Atkins diet allows only -20- grams of carbs per day when first starting out and tops out at 50 carbs a day when one is at their target weight.

One clue as to how wrong the currently accepted diet is, is the epidemic of childhood and adult diabetes. All those carbs wreck havoc with your blood sugar levels.

Low carb diets are sweeping the land because they work and they work very well at keeping the fat down. Triglycerites and cholesteral plummet on a low carb diet.

Dr. Atkins has the answer. Not the hippie "beans and sprout" nutritionist crowd currently holding reign over the nations health.

Part of the puzzle is a major revamping of the food triangle.


22 posted on 06/29/2003 6:10:22 PM PDT by Milwaukee_Guy (The Law of Unintended Consequences - No good deed shall go unpunished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Thanks for the post. How's the diet and walking thing working for you?
23 posted on 06/29/2003 6:11:10 PM PDT by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Drug addicts, obese people,high risk lifestyles are some of nature's way of thinning the herd. Like rats that share too much space, the population controls itself by murder or self-mutilation-suicide.
24 posted on 06/29/2003 6:17:45 PM PDT by Porterville (I support US total global, world domination; how's that for sensitive??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Funny! Those bars are terrible, aren't they?

Fortunately, they aren't part of my diet. My diet is actually quite simple. I eat just "whole" foods. Basically just meat, fish, vegetables, fruits and nuts. For breakfast, I have a couple of hard boiled (sometimes fried) eggs. For lunch, I have a tin of sardines packed in olive oil or a banana. Dinner is pretty much whatever I want, so long as the food is "whole" and not processed junk. Since April 1, I haven't had any junk food or fast food whatsoever.

In addition to that, I walk everyday and like the article above states, I use a pedometer to ensure I walk 10,000 steps a day. In fact, I usually do 15,000 to 20,000 steps a day which amounts to 7-10 miles. I walk three miles every morning around my neighborhood at 5AM. Then I walk 4 miles during my lunch hour. These two walks supercharge my metabolism and is probably the biggest contributing factor in my weight loss. On weekends or other days when I don't have to work, I do one super long walk of at least 6-8 miles. In fact, I did a 10 mile walk yesterday morning.

As one who has been overweight for some 20 years, I don't buy the excuses everybody else has for being overweight. It's all about calories burned and calories taken in. If you burn more calories than you take in day after day, you will lose weight. Simple as that.

25 posted on 06/29/2003 6:17:59 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 256 (-44))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
...after I have my dinner of steak, baked potatoe and fried mushrooms and onions

Dan? Dan, is that you? Long time, no see.

26 posted on 06/29/2003 6:20:52 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina ("Shut up," he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
Hey now!As a fellow Huntingtonian,it was spelled wrong on the card his "handlers" gave him.
27 posted on 06/29/2003 6:23:38 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Congrats on the weight loss. It is hard work, about 6 years ago I weighed 255, and I got down to 195lbs, I am around 205 right now. It is a lot of hard work, to me it is really no different than any other kind of addiction. Fortunately I love to work out now and work out about 5 times a week early in the morning. Once your body gets addicted to working out, you can't live without it.... Good job getting the weight off...
28 posted on 06/29/2003 6:25:41 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Thanks for the post. How's the diet and walking thing working for you?

Thanks for asking. Please read my reply #25 for more details. Basically it is working fantastic. All you need is the discipline to do the miles and to avoid the "bad" foods and the weight problem takes care of itself.

When I returned from my annual convention in Florida at the end of March, I discovered that for the first time in my life, I weighed 300 pounds. That is because I decided to weigh myself after a week of gorging on all the food that was available during the convention. I was disgusted with myself and resolved to do something about it. I had been overweight since I got out of the Marines back in 1985 and I have been slowly adding on since then. I never thought it was a major problem until then. 300 pounds was a lot!

So I basically put myself "back in boot camp". I started waking up at 5AM so that I could walk 3 miles before going to work. Three months later, I am still getting up at 5AM - every day, even weekends. Only now I am also walking at other times during the day so that I now average 7-8 miles a day. The only thing that keeps me from walking more is time. But even so, I am losing 2-3 pounds a week on average.

Losing weight ain't easy but it can be done.

29 posted on 06/29/2003 6:27:02 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 256 (-44))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FoxPro
One of the things I will do when I go out to east or get take out is just cut the portion size in half, and put it on a seperate plate and not eat it...
30 posted on 06/29/2003 6:28:13 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
He drives everywhere--even two blocks to the corner store.

To pick up his Suzy Qs, doughnuts and a fruit pie, no doubt.

Barf, I get sick just thinking about that much sweet stuff!

31 posted on 06/29/2003 6:28:54 PM PDT by mombonn (Have you prayed for our President yet today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Once your body gets addicted to working out, you can't live without it....

I know exactly what you mean. In fact, my wife thinks I've simply traded one addiction for another. But this addiction is much better for my health. I have resolved to wake up at 5AM to do my first walk every morning until I reach my target weight of 185. A couple weeks ago, I didn't get home until 1:30AM (I was at a party), I still woke up at 5AM to do my walk. Though I did take an hour nap later that day (it was a Sunday) and then after my nap, I went out and walked another 3 miles!

Last Wednesday, I flew home from Alabama and due to timing of the flights, I didn't get to do my regular walking (still woke up at 5AM but had to be at the Birmingham airport by 7:30). During a layover in Baltimore, I walked up and down the terminal just to get some miles in.

32 posted on 06/29/2003 6:34:54 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 256 (-44))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xrp
POTHEADS RAID KRISPY KREME!

(The old munchies curse!)

33 posted on 06/29/2003 6:35:34 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Humans evolved fat genes during their hunter-gatherer period, when it was feast or famine. To help survive times of scarcity, early humans evolved a taste for energy-rich sugars and fats and the ability to efficiently convert these calories to body fat. But with the development of agriculture, food supplies became more consistent. To protect against obesity, humans began evolving lean genes that made the body less efficient at converting calories into body fat. Today, different people carry fat and lean genes in different combinations.

Other than the fact this is totally unprovable, with this kind of argument, all we have to do is lay around and wait for our genes to evolve. Problem Solved. No need for government to come in and wreck the natural order.

34 posted on 06/29/2003 6:36:22 PM PDT by Dr Warmoose (Just don't leave any brass with your fingerprints on it behind, OK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I am logging off for a while so I can jump on the excercise bike...
35 posted on 06/29/2003 6:38:44 PM PDT by lorrainer (Oh, was I ranting? Sorry.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
We have a remarkable ability to delude ourselves, to our detriment.

Put the word "salad" on the menu, and I'll guarantee you some people will convince themselves that it's healthy and low-cal, no matter what the ingredients. I had lunch a few weeks ago with a weight-conscious (and mildly overweight) young lady who informed me in advance that she would have only a salad. So of course, she had a salad of baby greens (good, so far), topped with slices of blackened chicken (well... OK, if it stopped there, but...), bacon (a generous sprinkling), cheese (lots), and about a half-cup of blue cheese dressing. Of course, she had a Diet Coke.

36 posted on 06/29/2003 6:43:44 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina ("Shut up," he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; CatoRenasci
Yep, it's a question of social class. The highest rates of obesity are among the poor, whether black, Hispanic or white (though not Asian, so far as I've observed). The middle class has some obesity, though at a lower rate than the poor, and usually to a less horrifying degree. And you will very seldom see an member of the upper class who is obese.

Lest it be said that this is because upper-class people have the time, money, and energy to work out, I'd have to differ, for two reasons.

First, upper class people are thin even if they're broke and couldn't dream of belonging to a health club, so money is clearly not the issue.

Second, upper class people tend not to "jog" or belong to gyms. They keep their weight down by dietary self-discipline and by mucking out the stalls or scraping barnacles off the hull again. Cato, do you agree?

37 posted on 06/29/2003 6:44:23 PM PDT by Capriole (Foi vainquera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
The only thing a fellow New Englander wants to know is where is the restaurant you mentioned?

(and how to get a hold of a ticket for a Bruce Springstein concert at Fenway.)
38 posted on 06/29/2003 6:48:40 PM PDT by libravoter (Live from the People's Republic of Cambridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dr Warmoose
This is really the first (maybe second) generation in which the need for physical activity has been all but eliminated. I don't think it's genes at all. The human body was designed to walk. In fact, walking is more natural for the human body then standing or sitting. For thousands of years, humans had to either do a lot of walking or a lot of physical activity (usually both).

I am reading about the Civil War right now and those soldiers would think nothing of walking 20-30 miles a day. All that on slim rations of mostly hardtack and whatever else passed for food back then. In fact, Abraham Lincoln was so strong that he could hold an axe straight out by the end of the handle without his arm even shaking. That was only about 150 years ago.

Over the past 50 years, the need to walk has virtually been eliminated. Even jobs that used to involve a lot of menial labor have been automated to some extent. If one is to burn additional calories to avoid gaining weight, one must choose to exercise (walking, jogging, weightlifting, etc.).

Ironically, choosing to exercise makes it easier to eat less because exercise suppresses hunger. That is why those who attempt to lose weight by diet alone often fail. I've lost 44 pounds in three months and not once have I been particularly hungry due to my walking 7-8 miles a day. Yes, when good food is placed in front of me, I'll eat with gusto. But I don't have any "cravings" that cause me to eat junk or fast foods.

39 posted on 06/29/2003 6:49:58 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 256 (-44))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Milwaukee_Guy
Bump!! You are right on--Atkins has it right on!!! Carbs are the American culprit!!!
40 posted on 06/29/2003 6:54:42 PM PDT by BobFromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson