Skip to comments.
Want Diversity? Think Fuzzy
Washington Post ^
| June 25, 2003
| Michael Kinsley
Posted on 06/29/2003 4:35:02 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine
Admission to a prestige institution such as the University of Michigan or its law school is what computer types call a "binary" decision. It's yes or no. You're in or you're out. There is no partial or halfway admission. The effect of any factor in that decision is also binary. It either changes the result or it doesn't. It makes all the difference or it makes none at all. Those are the only possibilities.
For any individual, the process of turning factors into that yes-or-no decision doesn't matter. Any factor that changes the result has the same impact as if it were an absolute quota of one. It gets you in, or it keeps you out. And this is either right or it is wrong. The process of turning factors into a result doesn't matter here either. In this sense, the moral question is binary too.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: admissions; bakke; kinsley; lawschool; sandradayoconer; uofmichigan
I could not find an earlier post of this.
Kinsley in a rational mood, tearing the Supremes decision on the Law School to shreds.
So9
To: Servant of the Nine
The court's message to universities and other selective, government-financed institutions is: We have fudged this dangerous issue. You should do the same. He certainly nails this one.
I wonder why the rare display of rationality? Wanna bet he has a kid who is applying to graduate school?
2
posted on
06/29/2003 4:39:46 PM PDT
by
07055
To: 07055
Wanna bet he has a kid who is applying to graduate school? I didn't think he had ever been that involved with a woman.
So9
3
posted on
06/29/2003 4:44:56 PM PDT
by
Servant of the Nine
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: Servant of the Nine
The interesting thing is that the University did not and does not need to use race, or more properly ethnicity since they favor Hispanics and that's not a race (or even a single cluture. They could do, as many schools do, use economic status as well as something akin to the 10% rule that Texas schools use. Economic status will correllate well with ethnicity, and what's more do it when there are real "barriers" the applicant has overcome. It will do so without turning down the Vietnamese kid who falls into a disfavored minority, from a poor family and the "wrong" side of town, or the kid from Appalachia or parts of Arkansas and nearby parts of surrounding states. But no, they didn't wish to that, they wished to favor some goups over others based on where their ancestors came from.
4
posted on
06/29/2003 5:09:43 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: El Gato
The 10% involves giving automatic addmission to anyone graduating in the top 10% of their high school class. It's not the greatest idea, but at least it's ethnicity neutral.
5
posted on
06/29/2003 5:11:30 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: El Gato
The article writer erred in referring to U of M as a "prestige" institution. Actually, under the current policies, U of M seems to be the very sort of cracker operation my mother always warned me against.
With the blessing of the USSC U of M can now continue to discriminate against Jews, Asians and Hillbillies.
People who would send their kid to that school are the kind of people I would not like to have living in my neighborhood, nor would I care to do business with them, or attend their church.
6
posted on
06/29/2003 7:30:40 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: El Gato
The article writer erred in referring to U of M as a "prestige" institution. Actually, under the current policies, U of M seems to be the very sort of cracker operation my mother always warned me against.
With the blessing of the USSC U of M can now continue to discriminate against Jews, Asians and Hillbillies.
People who would send their kid to that school are the kind of people I would not like to have living in my neighborhood, nor would I care to do business with them, or attend their church.
7
posted on
06/29/2003 7:30:41 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: El Gato
The article writer erred in referring to U of M as a "prestige" institution. Actually, under the current policies, U of M seems to be the very sort of cracker operation my mother always warned me against.
With the blessing of the USSC U of M can now continue to discriminate against Jews, Asians and Hillbillies.
People who would send their kid to that school are the kind of people I would not like to have living in my neighborhood, nor would I care to do business with them, or attend their church.
8
posted on
06/29/2003 7:30:41 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: 07055
" Wanna bet he has a kid who is applying to graduate school? "
In my experience, graduate school still uses merit to select students. They simply can't afford to employ anyone who is not the best; they have their reputations to protect! At least that is the case at the top institutions.
9
posted on
06/29/2003 9:54:59 PM PDT
by
BamaGirl
To: BamaGirl
I'm glad I am going to Michigan tech instead of the liberal paradise of the midwest.
To: El Gato
I think I like that 10% idea- I like it MUCH better than affirmative action, at least, because the top 10% of the students at ANY school must be the ones who excelled in their particular environment.
11
posted on
06/30/2003 4:11:31 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(where oh where did my little fishy go?)
To: John Will
Good for you!
12
posted on
06/30/2003 10:07:47 PM PDT
by
BamaGirl
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson