Skip to comments.
Shreveport Counselor Sees More Sex, Pornography Addicts
Shreveport, LA, Times ^
| 06-29-03
| Haag, Diane
Posted on 06/29/2003 12:09:32 PM PDT by Theodore R.
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:00:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: templar
If you want to know more about her, I believe there are still nude pictures of her available on the internet.I believe you just helped support her claim that pornography on the Internet overshadowed and cancelled out the good that the medium would otherwise have provided.
41
posted on
06/29/2003 4:57:11 PM PDT
by
judgeandjury
(The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state.)
To: The_Pickle
However I can't agree that the government should have any say in the matter beyond legislation to keep it out of the hands of minors. I see sense in much of the legislation being brought forth i.e. requiring filters on computers in Public Libraries to limit their ability to access porn, yet I am still a firm believer in what a person does behind closed doors,(and don't get all indignent and make stupid statements about abusing kids and farm animals) is none of the governments bussiness. Totally agree.
Although, I'd push for the ending of Public Libraries too - but that's the capitalist in me :)
42
posted on
06/29/2003 4:57:40 PM PDT
by
DAnconia55
(Thumping the Moral Ayatollahs, daily.)
To: DAnconia55
Yeah, I know what you mean. That never happened before the internet existed.Further in my post, I also said this:
Pornography is not the root of the problem- he would have been a jerk even without it- it just made him an even bigger jerk than he would have been.
However, in the long run, I am way happier he went off with someone else. I love the internet, and I used to pay for my ex's Playboy subscription, but internet porn has a way of dragging people in. The leaving was just the final step. Whenever he would go on a porn binge, it was a very unhappy time in our house. Any "addiction" usually has very bad side effects that are almost worse than what they are doing- lying, defensiveness, covering up, etc.
To: DoughtyOne
Don't get me wrong - I agree with much of what she says - and I admire her strength of conviction - not that I necessariy agree with everything she says - however - the way she often passes judgment so harshly and in such a condescending way - leaves her open to judgement of her own personal history.
Overall - I like listening to her sometimes - it's entertaining and provacative - but like the old saying goes - "judge not lest ye be judged" (or something like that.)
44
posted on
06/29/2003 5:25:04 PM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: M. Peach
I'm not trying to be argumentitive, but do you think Laura should just stay off the air then? I don't think so. She's probably aged and gained a better perspective. I still think that if what she is saying is right, then it's right for her to say it.
I understand your those who live in glass houses comment, but mose of us live in glass houses to a certain extent.
Look, if Monica Lewinsky came out and said, "What I did was terrible, I wish I hadn't and I would urge other women not to do the same thing, would be be wrong to say it?" I don't think so. In fact I'd encourage her to do so.
45
posted on
06/29/2003 7:46:36 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Vote RIPublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet left behind!")
To: DoughtyOne
You are correct - but I don't know if I've ever heard Dr. Laura apologize for her indiscretions - of course I may have missed it - but I have never even heard her mention it.
Like I said - I like Dr. Laura - I admire her stance against the gays - although it almost ruined her. She is the voice of moral righteousness. I just think she could be a little more tactful at times....
But hey - if my ideas were so great I would be nationally syndicated instead of her....
46
posted on
06/29/2003 9:12:02 PM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: M. Peach
I'll be honest, I don't listen to her, so it isn't really fair for me to discuss her tactics to the inth degree. I hope I've made some general comments that would apply, but not a real endorsement of her style. She could very well need to use more tact. There are a lot of talk show hosts who use that style though. I think they feel that if they let their guard down even once, folks won't think they know what they are talking about. Personally I'd rather have a person be frank with me, admitting error at times and letting the chips fall where they will. I respect that.
47
posted on
06/30/2003 1:03:15 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Vote RIPublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet left behind!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson