To: metesky; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
Thanks!
12 posted on
06/29/2003 8:37:10 AM PDT by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
thanks for the ping!!!
22 posted on
06/29/2003 9:35:58 AM PDT by
dennisw
(G-d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: Pokey78
Good article. Thanks Pokey.
My point is that laws ought to be about clearly defined acts and a high court should be concerned with the legal principles at stake in those acts.
I couldn't agree more.
To: Pokey78
Thanks for the ping! I was hoping he'd comment on the Supremes.
80 posted on
06/29/2003 10:30:42 PM PDT by
lainde
To: Pokey78
"...scion of the first Android American" "Swingin' Sandra" LOL!! (Oh my aching sides!)
84 posted on
06/30/2003 7:16:46 AM PDT by
Joan912
(mmmmmm, Bacardi Silver...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson