I think it is more likely to end up being applied to private drug use than prostitution.
It'll be applied to everything. And IMO the only reason the libertarians are supporting it is the private drug use thing. The legal challenges haven't even started yet. We know the gay activists are planning on suing for more "equality" under this ruling. Polygamists, prostitutes and those who LUUUUUUV their pets and NAMBLA won't be far behind.
I dissagree.
Private drug use has a way of spilling over into the public. Like when that guy last week used drugs in private, then killed his roommate, ate part of her lung and then walked down the street with blood dripping from his mouth and shirt.
According to SCROTUM (Supreme Court, Rulers of the United Mandates) The killing and the eating since it was in private is ok, walking down the street bloody well that's reprehensible.
Prostitution on the other hand. The state needs a "compelling interest" to regulate it. If the spread of disease which is clearly more prominent in homosexual circles than in prostitution isn't a compelling state interest. If morality isn't a compelling state interest. Then what the heck kind of interest could the state possibly have in regulating it.
The only thing the state can do now is license it, tax the heck out of it and burden it with rediculous amounts of paperwork. That's the way the kill anything good in society.