Posted on 06/28/2003 8:49:26 AM PDT by yonif
My understanding is that after he sobered up, he taught Sunday school. It was for a "few" years. In other words the article I read on how long was vague. BTW, he had a drinking problem. Heck, we all have out shortcomings ... atleast he overcame that one.
My understanding is that after he sobered up, he taught Sunday school. It was for a "few" years. In other words the article I read on how long was vague. BTW, he had a drinking problem. Heck, we all have out shortcomings ... atleast he overcame that one.
One more thing, he has an undergraduate degree in History so he SHOULD know all about Muslims and their reign of terror. Surely he can't still believe these are peace loving people after knowing their history.
"Personally I would trust any ten fairys that Bush might appoint to these low level staffer positions than I would any of the idiots that Chuck Baldwin would recommend."
Going from one extreme to the other doesn't become you or make yo credible.
"I mean can you seriously take the advice of people that see God's face in a thunder cloud or attribute every tornado outbreak to God's vengence over Israel. Next Baldwin wont allow divorced people to serve in Government."
Ridicule of others beliefs also doesn't win you any points or friends. It only highlights how pathetic you are.
"He might even prohibit appointments of Catholics, after all some wingnuts consider them a cult."
Instead of the race card you now seek to divide people ... Hmmmmm taking lessons from Hiltery and her gang i.e. "right wing conspiracy". Or do you buy into that one too? LOL!
"Maybe later Baldwin might eliminate all women because according to the scriptures they must be subject to their husbands and barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. "
The more you squeal the more you display how moronic you are. Here's another one for you - "Maybe" Baldwin would put you to death because you are guilty of adultry. (Assuming a woman would have you ... and like ole bill can't keep his zipper up). You see all these extreme allegations only serve to show your extreme ignorance and inability to debate rationally.
"If homosexuality ever becomes accepted in this country it will not be because George Bush appointed some Log Cabin Republicans to low level positions, but because extremists like Chuck Baldwin make the gays look good by comparison."
Still NO comment on all the homos George appointed? Nah, we want to ignore all that, ridiclue, use extreme analogies and make up extreme situations to mock others on a subject you know nothing about.
BTW, since you chose to remain blind ... George Bush CATERS to the 1-2% of the homo segment. Yet, YOU remain silent on this FACT. What George Bush does is ENABLE the homos in their agenda, Dah, how stipid can one be NOT to see that? Surely, YOU get the prize for such stupidity.
I don't. The ten or so gay appointments by your idol George Bush were not taken from a "gay website". I think paranoia maybe setting in with you. Sure you're not "queer"? You get soooo defensive of Bush elevating gays in positions of authority.
"The only position that you mentioned that has any "Power and authority" was the Canadian Ambassador and the person appointed to that position "
Ah, now we're going to MINIMIZE gay positions appointed by Bush. What a hoot! ALL positons that Bush appoints ARE positions of power and authority. Any ONE of those appointments has more clout, power and authority than you'll EVER have well unless you're gay - then maybe ile George will consider you. You see brilliance has nothing to do with it. It's all about your sexual persuasian and it wouldn't shock me if you're a closet gay.
"Face it, five to ten percent of the population is gay."
Fact is 1-2% of the population is gay. And with all the people to chose form ole George picks folks that can't figure out who they should be sexually attracted to. Heavy duty denial of WHO they are made to be attracted to is a tad scarey. There's no telling what other issues allude them. They are NOT normal nor trustworthy. Sorry, if you're gay, that applies to you as well.
Must make you and your religious bigot friends feel pretty inadequate, huh, that GWB would appoint talented homosexuals over moronic nutcases and Gary Bauer butt kissers.
I bet they have to sharpen their own pencils and make their own copies.
I didnt think I did scuz for brains. How is appointing a handful of homosexuals to as you put it POSITIONS OF POWER so threatening to you? If they represent 1-2% of the population, I would be surprised if Bush didnt appoint a few. Unlike Clinton, you can be sure he didnt go out and hire them on the basis of their sexual preference.
Going back to this paranoia you have, why is it again that you are so threatened by these few queers. Are you afraid they are going to seduce you, or do you think they will gather together and rape you. You act like another latent homo badmouthing what he secretly desires. Is that you, a latent homo? LOL!!
Not at all. Ishmael was born after the flesh. Isaac was born after the promise. The Father did not promise Ishmael. He came due to Sarai's (Sarah) lack of faith.
Ishmael's progeny is not the heir(s) of anything although the Father blessed him due to Hagar's cry. He was Abram's (Abraham) illegitimate son. Isaac was legitimate, and the promised one (Genesis 16, 17:21).
Be careful with that one. See Malachi 1:2,3 & Romans 9:13.
The President of the U.S. signed a bill for a city program? Me thinks your information is incorrect (and not just on this particular point).
As far as the other items listed in your post:
Bush has no control over what kind of rally any gay or lesbian group decides to hold. Apparently it wasn't very big - it sure wasn't mentioned on any news shows or in any papers I read.
I doubt Bush has had any time to even think about reversing policies put in place by Clinton re: gays. Seems he's been a bit busy lately fighting the war on terror and dealing with the economy. This argument doesn't hold any water with me.
As to the appointments you mentioned, I will say again, it does not appear he's appointed any to positions from which they can significantly impact the political/moral landscape.
Actually, as was pointed out here earlier, it as given to Abraham and his descendents. Ishmael was one of them.
So you're talking quotas? I was talking appointing the best person for the job.He's suggesting that this is normal and they are equal in judgement to those who are atleast heterosexuals.
He's suggesting that this is normal and they are equal in judgement to those who are atleast heterosexuals.
So Newt Gingrich should have been tossed out on his ear when he told his wife (while she lay in her hospital bed) that he wanted a divorce? That seems very immoral to me. (I agree with Newt on politics, but this was an utterly distasteful act on his part.)
Me: COrrect - exisiting embryonic stem cells even though he LIED to conservative organizations through letters stating that he WOULD NOT okay this. Besides it is WRONG to do this to begin with. So, he blatently lied and compromised himself on embryonic stem cell research.
Sorry, we disagree on this. I don't see how it could be considered a lie. The concern was the destruction of embryoes to obtain their stem cells. With Bush's decision, that is not permitted.
Fine, don't vote for Bush next time. Who will it be? Dean? Kerry? Or will you simply not vote?
Using a little hyperbole there, fella? While you may think that all gays should be locked out of ever working, there are some brilliant ones out there.
Perverted, but brilliant.
If we are going to lock out anyone who practices sin from working, then most likely, your very favorite congressperson would have to be done away with.
In fact, I doubt you'd have a job yourself.
Agreed. And if we are talking from a purely political standpoint, I don't think Israel should have to give up a single inch of land.
But when we start talking about 'don't turn on Israel or God is going to get you,' that's a different thing entirely. The Israel of today is a secular state, not a theocracy. Therefore, we can't be sure that God's warning refers to THIS Israel at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.