Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
NO comment on the homos Bush appointed? Or WHY he catered to the 1-2% of the population that is homo for these positions? My, my, how we love to gloss over the issue.

"Personally I would trust any ten fairys that Bush might appoint to these low level staffer positions than I would any of the idiots that Chuck Baldwin would recommend."

Going from one extreme to the other doesn't become you or make yo credible.

"I mean can you seriously take the advice of people that see God's face in a thunder cloud or attribute every tornado outbreak to God's vengence over Israel. Next Baldwin wont allow divorced people to serve in Government."

Ridicule of others beliefs also doesn't win you any points or friends. It only highlights how pathetic you are.

"He might even prohibit appointments of Catholics, after all some wingnuts consider them a cult."

Instead of the race card you now seek to divide people ... Hmmmmm taking lessons from Hiltery and her gang i.e. "right wing conspiracy". Or do you buy into that one too? LOL!

"Maybe later Baldwin might eliminate all women because according to the scriptures they must be subject to their husbands and barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. "

The more you squeal the more you display how moronic you are. Here's another one for you - "Maybe" Baldwin would put you to death because you are guilty of adultry. (Assuming a woman would have you ... and like ole bill can't keep his zipper up). You see all these extreme allegations only serve to show your extreme ignorance and inability to debate rationally.

"If homosexuality ever becomes accepted in this country it will not be because George Bush appointed some Log Cabin Republicans to low level positions, but because extremists like Chuck Baldwin make the gays look good by comparison."

Still NO comment on all the homos George appointed? Nah, we want to ignore all that, ridiclue, use extreme analogies and make up extreme situations to mock others on a subject you know nothing about.

BTW, since you chose to remain blind ... George Bush CATERS to the 1-2% of the homo segment. Yet, YOU remain silent on this FACT. What George Bush does is ENABLE the homos in their agenda, Dah, how stipid can one be NOT to see that? Surely, YOU get the prize for such stupidity.

108 posted on 06/30/2003 8:35:34 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: nmh
NO comment on the homos Bush appointed? Or WHY he catered to the 1-2% of the population that is homo for these positions? My, my, how we love to gloss over the issue.

I didnt think I did scuz for brains. How is appointing a handful of homosexuals to as you put it POSITIONS OF POWER so threatening to you? If they represent 1-2% of the population, I would be surprised if Bush didnt appoint a few. Unlike Clinton, you can be sure he didnt go out and hire them on the basis of their sexual preference.

Going back to this paranoia you have, why is it again that you are so threatened by these few queers. Are you afraid they are going to seduce you, or do you think they will gather together and rape you. You act like another latent homo badmouthing what he secretly desires. Is that you, a latent homo? LOL!!

112 posted on 06/30/2003 9:13:22 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson