I don't. The ten or so gay appointments by your idol George Bush were not taken from a "gay website". I think paranoia maybe setting in with you. Sure you're not "queer"? You get soooo defensive of Bush elevating gays in positions of authority.
"The only position that you mentioned that has any "Power and authority" was the Canadian Ambassador and the person appointed to that position "
Ah, now we're going to MINIMIZE gay positions appointed by Bush. What a hoot! ALL positons that Bush appoints ARE positions of power and authority. Any ONE of those appointments has more clout, power and authority than you'll EVER have well unless you're gay - then maybe ile George will consider you. You see brilliance has nothing to do with it. It's all about your sexual persuasian and it wouldn't shock me if you're a closet gay.
"Face it, five to ten percent of the population is gay."
Fact is 1-2% of the population is gay. And with all the people to chose form ole George picks folks that can't figure out who they should be sexually attracted to. Heavy duty denial of WHO they are made to be attracted to is a tad scarey. There's no telling what other issues allude them. They are NOT normal nor trustworthy. Sorry, if you're gay, that applies to you as well.
Must make you and your religious bigot friends feel pretty inadequate, huh, that GWB would appoint talented homosexuals over moronic nutcases and Gary Bauer butt kissers.
I bet they have to sharpen their own pencils and make their own copies.
Using a little hyperbole there, fella? While you may think that all gays should be locked out of ever working, there are some brilliant ones out there.
Perverted, but brilliant.
If we are going to lock out anyone who practices sin from working, then most likely, your very favorite congressperson would have to be done away with.
In fact, I doubt you'd have a job yourself.