Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2003 2:00:27 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
I reckon that some of them lawmaking folks forgot about that part of the Constitution that denies the states the right to pass any ex post facto law.
2 posted on 06/28/2003 2:19:22 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
""Today's ruling will allow child molesters to escape prosecution, simply because they preyed on our children years ago,'' California Attorney General Bill Lockyer said in a statement."


THE AMBER ALERT SYSTEM state-by-state

PEDO WATCH.org: "SEX OFFENDER AND OTHER OFFENDER LISTS"

FBI's MOST WANTED: CRIME ALERTS

3 posted on 06/28/2003 2:43:02 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
OK--I have had it!

The SCOTUS is out of control. In one week, they rule that:

1. "Diversity" is in the Constitution, emanating from a penumbra of some vapor

2. Gave a home run pitch to homosexual "marriage"

3. Nullified justice for hundreds for victims who endured horrible sexual abuse at the hands of homosexual monsters masquerading as human beings

I put their fate in the hands of Almighty God. May those members of the court receive His justice--and contemplate it in eternity.


5 posted on 06/28/2003 3:09:03 AM PDT by SkyPilot (""First Tim, let me say, I don't know, I can't answer that." --Howard Dean to Russert (27 times))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Also, I noted that most of the cases of sexual abusers were homosexual pedophiles. This was reported by our local German telelvision news affiliate as affecting 850 cases--most of those being "gay men."

There is a story about the higher profile pedophile priests on AP and Yahoo News...
HERE.


6 posted on 06/28/2003 3:19:34 AM PDT by SkyPilot (""First Tim, let me say, I don't know, I can't answer that." --Howard Dean to Russert (27 times))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
As convenient as it may be for attorneys general and prosecutors, the statute of limitations laws are in place for a good reason and serve a good purpose.

I'm sure many of the same would love to repeal laws against double jeopardy. It would make their jobs so much easier. But our Constitution and these laws aren't in place for the ease and convenience of prosecutors. They are to protect citizens from endless legal persecution.

8 posted on 06/28/2003 3:46:12 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Surely, the Supreme Court did not have this in mind? Molesters on the loose?
12 posted on 06/28/2003 4:35:23 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
It's pretty difficult to prove where you were on March 15, 1976 at 3:00 PM.
16 posted on 06/28/2003 6:34:20 AM PDT by gitmo (What's in the Constitution isn't. And vice-versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson