Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
They had a bad week, to be sure. But it doesn't rise to the level of impeachment. Nor would this impeachment initiative get off the ground.

NFP

3 posted on 06/27/2003 6:36:33 PM PDT by Notforprophet (Be ye not lost among precepts of Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Notforprophet
But it doesn't rise to the level of impeachment.

Sure as hell does. Too bad it won't happen.

7 posted on 06/27/2003 6:42:21 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Notforprophet
Recent Australian accusation of moral turpitude, meant in somewhat similar circumstance: "Crean slams Hollingworth for 'moral turpitude'.

From the article:

SIMON CREAN: Yes, but this is was the test that the Prime Minister made and I simply asked this question, Tony ... in terms of someone who continues to protect a paedophile when they were in a position of authority where they should have referred that, that is not appropriate action.

8 posted on 06/27/2003 6:45:06 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Notforprophet; ALS
"But it doesn't rise to the level of impeachment."

Wholesale disregard of at least three amendments this week doesn't rise to the level of impeachment. Huh.

I agree with ALS that impeachment is politically impossible, but disagree that their breach of the constitution is insufficient to impeachment. If flagrant disregard of the constitution among justices doesn't rise to the level, nothing does.

The distinction is that Americans are so uneducated and indoctrinated that they wouldn't recognize a high crime against the constitution. So constitutionally legitimate impeachments are politically impossible.

For which we can thank the Teachers' Union.

9 posted on 06/27/2003 6:47:29 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Notforprophet
What can work and should be done is taking away
jurisdiction of the issue form the federal courts.

The real issue being marriage. The logic
of the Court was to take an extreme view
of the made up right of privacy.
The Court made it clear it plans on
saying the right to privacy means the
government cannot define marriage.

So there will a right to gay marriage,
sex with animals etc...

Government in effect will no longer recognize
the family and marriage as the principle institution
of man.
The Court is adopting a Hegelian view that
the Government is the only legitimate institution
of man.

The Court is telling you it is giving you rights
when in reality it is taking the most extreme
statist view possible.

The Court has to be stopped!
57 posted on 06/28/2003 5:10:07 AM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson