[RonF]

This ruling concerns a sexual relationship between two consenting adults. The legality of sexual relationships that involve at least one entity who is legally defined as being unable to give consent due to a lack of capacity (age or mental status) aren't affected.

[af_vet_1981]

This ruling concerns a sexual relationship between two consenting adults. The legality of sexual relationships that involve at least one entity who is legally defined as being unable to give consent due to a lack of capacity (age or mental status) aren't affected. yet

There is nothing in their reasoning to prevent it. They have no foundation to rest upon. They are making it up as they go, perhaps even subject to the latest in the porn fashion market.

As Justice Scalia pointed out, the battle lines are drawn, they are coming for us and our children. It is only a matter of time. It's really a shame Pat Buchanan is anti-Israel.

[Travis McGee]

So why can't a dying life partner give consent on video tape and in his will before witnesses that he wishes his surviving life partner to engage in necrophilia with his corpse?

Why can't a father spend 17 years seducing his daughter (or son) and then consumate their "love" beginning on his or her 18th birthday? The 18 year old would be giving legal consent.

How can a state outlaw the above acts, but not sodomy?