To: zoyd
Why do homosexualists use an accusation of homosexualism as a put down on anyone who opposes their Homo-Juggernaut if there is nothing wrong with being a homosexualist as they claim ?
Of course any five year old knows not to play with his own or other's poop because its dangerous. Oddly, the Supreme Court doesn't understand this with their insistance on decimating the 10th Amendment.
32 posted on
06/26/2003 6:18:48 PM PDT by
pyx
To: pyx
Why do homosexualists use an accusation of homosexualism as a put down on anyone who opposes their Homo-Juggernaut if there is nothing wrong with being a homosexualist as they claim ? First off, I don't know what a homosexualist is, precisely, but I'll entertain your question. People who 'oppose the Homo-Juggernaut' get offended when you suggest that THEY'RE homosexual. That's why.
36 posted on
06/26/2003 6:23:43 PM PDT by
zoyd
(My nameplate medallion says "Never Trust A HAL 9000")
To: pyx
>> Why do homosexualists use an accusation of homosexualism as a put down...
Kinda funny it goes both ways in this battle.
There has been a perennial gay rights battle in Oregon now for about the last 20 years.
Back when former Nike executive, Portland Mayor, and Transportation Secretary (under Carter) Neil Goldschmidt was Governor, he issued an executive order giving gays rights that others in state employment didn't enjoy. That order spawned an organization known as the Oregon Citizen's Alliance, who immediately launched an initiative drive to overturn the order. The initiative won approval by the voters, and the order was rescinded.
Subsequently, they lauched anti special rights initiatives statewide and in most cities and counties. One of the cities to approve such a law was Springfield, right next door to Eugene. During the campaign there was much heated debate, one of the more vocal proponents of the measure was a conservative Springfield City Councilor and Sheriff's deputy who's name I would like to mention but can't spell (it's Polish). Though he was on our side (or at least my side), he was sometimes less than professional in his conduct during the campaign (though the other side did some nasty stuff, including painting pink triangles all over his house and car, then creating a ruckus on his property, waking him and his family to see the destruction - probably a dumb thing to do at a cop's house but nobody got shot). He would often accuse his opponents of being homosexual, though more often they were just plain old straight liberals who would quickly deny being gay ("I've been married for 20 years, I have four kids..." You know the drill)
I always thought it odd that if those people really didn't see anything wrong with being gay or promoting the gay lifestyle, they would be offended at being referred to as gay.
Dave in Eugene
114 posted on
06/29/2003 1:16:50 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(Tagline error. Press ALT-F4 to continue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson