[jwalsh07]

Look, it boils down to this. Kennedy wrote the decision and his opinion is that sodomy is a fundamental right while the life of the unborn isn't.

Libertarian whackoism.

Up is down, down is up. If sodomy is a fundamental right, then health care, a home in the burbs and a college education most certainly are as well.

With Kennedy's reasoning anything is possible because one can argue that without those the "dignity of the those indivduals is not respected".

Assinine.

[Skywalk]

Uh, right. So since Plessy v. Ferguson established separate but equal, that means that all rulings from that point forward are directly related?

I understand the "penumbra" was invoked in this decision, but I don't think one need think Roe V. Wade should stand just because one agrees with this decision or at least understands it.

Your assertion that because one has a right to engage in conduct that does not infringe on your rights means that one can claim rights that indenture others into your service is risible. Please connect those two.

Be logical, does right to be a holocaust revisionist or spread "hate" mean that one day I can claim the right to a free car? WHAT?

Look, take a different approach because that one is doomed.