[Skywalk]

Uh, right. So since Plessy v. Ferguson established separate but equal, that means that all rulings from that point forward are directly related?

I understand the "penumbra" was invoked in this decision, but I don't think one need think Roe V. Wade should stand just because one agrees with this decision or at least understands it.

Your assertion that because one has a right to engage in conduct that does not infringe on your rights means that one can claim rights that indenture others into your service is risible. Please connect those two.

Be logical, does right to be a holocaust revisionist or spread "hate" mean that one day I can claim the right to a free car? WHAT?

Look, take a different approach because that one is doomed.

[jwalsh07]

I understand the "penumbra" was invoked in this decision, but I don't think one need think Roe V. Wade should stand just because one agrees with this decision or at least understands it.

This is either the statement of a lunatic or one who hasn't read Kennedy's opinion.

He, the hypocritical sob, used Roe as precedent. The penumbra becomes precedent for expanding the penumbra.