Can anyone provide an argument why not?
What's so special about the number 2, if marriage doesn't mean one man and one woman?
And how can they deny the wish of a 40 year old man to marry his 18 year old "consenting" daughter (or son)?
Certainly the biological arguement can't hold up. What if he has a vasectomy?
Why can't daddy marry ALL of his "consenting" sons and daughters as they hit 18?
Can anyone provide an arguement why not?
Can anyone provide an argument why not?
...... or the number 1, for that matter. A while back, I read about a woman who married her TV!
It is a very slippery slope ... after homosexual marriage is acceptable then someone will seek another form of deviancy - bestiality. Why shouldn't they be allowed to marry their dog or horse or cow or chicken? It's a downward spiral.
