Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RIAA To Sue Individual's for File Sharing (This could mean you!!!!)
Miami Herald ^ | 06/25/2003 | Ted Bridis

Posted on 06/25/2003 6:15:06 PM PDT by jimmccleod

Music Labels Step Up Internet Piracy Hunt
TED BRIDIS
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The embattled music industry disclosed plans Wednesday for an unprecedented escalation in its fight against Internet piracy, threatening to sue hundreds of individual computer users who illegally share music files online.

The Recording Industry Association of America, citing significant sales declines, said it will begin Thursday to search Internet file-sharing networks to identify music fans who offer "substantial" collections of MP3 song files for downloading.

It expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within eight to 10 weeks.

Executives for the RIAA, the Washington-based lobbying group that represents major labels, would not say how many songs on a user's computer might qualify for a lawsuit. The new campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring Internet providers to identify subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music and movie files.

The RIAA's president, Cary Sherman, said tens of millions of Internet users of popular file-sharing software after Thursday will expose themselves to "the real risk of having to face the music." He said the RIAA plans only to file lawsuits against Internet users in the United States.

"It's stealing. It's both wrong and illegal," Sherman said. Alluding to the court decisions, Sherman said Internet users who believe they can hide behind an alias online are mistaken. "You are not anonymous," Sherman said. "We're going to begin taking names."

Shopping at a Virgin Megastore in San Francisco, Jason Yoder was planning to delete file-sharing software he uses from his home computer because of the new lawsuit threat. He acknowledged using the Internet recently to find a copy of a rare 1970s soul recording, but he agreed that illegal downloads should be curtailed.

"It's sort of like a serial drunk driver has to have their license taken away at some point," said Yoder, 30.

Sharman Networks Ltd., which makes the popular Kazaa software and operates one of the world's largest file-sharing networks, said in a statement, "It is unfortunate that the RIAA has chosen to declare war on its customers by engaging in protracted and expensive litigation." Sharman said it was interested in a business relationship with music labels and could protect their songs from illegal downloads using technology.

Country songwriter Hugh Prestwood, who has worked with Randy Travis, Trisha Yearwood and Jimmy Buffett, likened the RIAA's effort to a roadside police officer on a busy highway.

"It doesn't take too many tickets to get everybody to obey the speed limit," Prestwood said.

Critics accused the RIAA of resorting to heavy-handed tactics likely to alienate millions of Internet file-sharers.

"This latest effort really indicates the recording industry has lost touch with reality completely," said Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "Does anyone think more lawsuits are going to be the answer? Today they have declared war on the American consumer."

Sherman disputed that consumers, who are gradually turning to legitimate Web sites to buy music legally, will object to the industry's latest efforts against pirates.

"You have to look at exactly who are your customers," he said. "You could say the same thing about shoplifters - are you worried about alienating them? All sorts of industries and retailers have come to the conclusion that they need to be able to protect their rights. We have come to the same conclusion."

Mike Godwin of Public Knowledge, a consumer group that has challenged broad crackdowns on file-sharing networks, said Wednesday's announcement was appropriate because it targeted users illegally sharing copyrighted files.

"I'm sure it's going to freak them out," Godwin said. "The free ride is over." He added: "I wouldn't be surprised if at least some people engaged in file-trading decide to resist and try to find ways to thwart the litigation strategy."

The entertainment industry has gradually escalated its fight against piracy. The RIAA has previously sued four college students it accused of making thousands of songs available for illegal downloading on campus networks. But Wednesday's announcement was the first effort to target users who offer music on broadly accessible, public networks.

The Motion Picture Association of America said it supported the efforts, but notably did not indicate it plans to file large numbers of civil lawsuits against Internet users who trade movies online.

MPAA Chief Jack Valenti said in a statement it was "our most sincere desire" to find technology solutions to protect digital copies of movies.

Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., who has proposed giving the entertainment industry new powers to disrupt downloads of pirated music and movies, said the RIAA's actions were overdue. "It's about time," Berman said in a statement. "For too long ... file-traffickers have robbed copyright creators with impunity."

The RIAA said its lawyers will file lawsuits initially against people with the largest collections of music files they can find online. U.S. copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but Sherman said the RIAA will be open to settlement proposals from defendants.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: bearshare; filesharing; grokster; kazaa; limewire; morpheus; music; napster; riaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-337 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

To: motexva
Is it illegal to tape a show with your VCR?

No, but that's because this is a particular scenario that was covered by a particular (and very famous) case in the Supreme Court many years ago. This was deemed fair use, based on a premise called "time-shifting" that applies to this specific scenario. It has no relevance to music downloads.

Is it illegal to post an article on FR?

Yes. But again, infringement is in the eye of the infringed. It's up to a copyright holder to pursue a claim of infringement. Only two so far have seen fit to do so.

Is it illegal to make a copy of a song or songs from a CD for friend,

Yes.

or to listen to in your tape stereo in your car?

No.

Now my question: Do you know what you're talking about?

163 posted on 06/25/2003 9:25:33 PM PDT by wizzler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Dr Warmoose
You obviously need a more demanding job.
164 posted on 06/25/2003 9:25:38 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SkooldBiDaStayt
Enjoy your DRM-infested IBM PC that is nothing more than a XBox that can run Microsoft Office......

As a completely legal user of said system, I'll take it any day over your Chinese built Linux box getting your music from Kazaa......

165 posted on 06/25/2003 9:25:46 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Oddly, there is only one "S" in asinine.
166 posted on 06/25/2003 9:27:32 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: SkooldBiDaStayt
Then those of us who value our freedom will adopt a new motto: buy European IT products, but products that actually work.

Better idea. Why don't you just move there.

168 posted on 06/25/2003 9:28:17 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
You're a real piece of work, did you know that?
169 posted on 06/25/2003 9:29:27 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
You are very close to being on the motive. Lawyers are just out looking for the next "Payday". Matter of fact, this past weekend, a bunch of these hungry sharks had a meeting in Boston to discuss the 'next payday'. The next deep pockets they are targetting is Big Food (junk food). I'm sure these file swapping suites are just to keep empowered.
170 posted on 06/25/2003 9:29:41 PM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: wizzler
The RIAA is cuttin off its own D!(k.
But it's hey its legal.
171 posted on 06/25/2003 9:31:26 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Lawyers are just out looking for the next "Payday".

Easy solution: buy a CD, starve a lawyer.

172 posted on 06/25/2003 9:32:08 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
I haven't listened to music for years. I listen to talk radio.
173 posted on 06/25/2003 9:33:16 PM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
bump!
174 posted on 06/25/2003 9:33:59 PM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: mylife
bur hey it's legal.

i need an editor

175 posted on 06/25/2003 9:34:06 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

Comment #176 Removed by Moderator

To: SkooldBiDaStayt
Great -- a goth-metal snob AND a plastic-and-silicon snob.

"My favorite artists are far more musically gifted than the stuff on MTV" ... "My system lets me hear the inferior quality of MP3s that the peasants can't discern" ... "My computer can beat up your computer" ...

Geez, man!
177 posted on 06/25/2003 9:37:39 PM PDT by wizzler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
I don`t get this...First off, how can they prove you downloaded music? OK, maybe your server keeps a log on what you`ve been up to, but how does the RIAA get a hold of that? Do they go to each and every freggin` server demanding these logs and then spend umpteen hours going through each and every one? And what about pictures? Does this now include pictures, photos a well? How many billions of photos are downloaded everyday on the web, photos that are clearly copyrighted, but these photos are made available to anyone? I`m not talking about porn (which is probably paid for anyway) but just photos of anything, pictures that right here on FReerepublic are posted all the time..Pictures of Clinton and Hitlery for example, pictures that some photographer probably took and had copyrighted...So that means because i have a picture of Satan, I mean Hitlery on my computer, that I am now a felon? And doesn`t this whole copyright thing just pertain to making money off someone elses copyright? How does posting a picture of Hitlery "steal money" from the photographer? This is insane! And what about radio for cakes sake?? Is radio stations now going to close down?? Are they kidding? How much music is recorded by people everyday onto cassette tapes from the radio? I can understand these musicians and photographers wanting to get paid, but to me this claim that the industry is losing millions is ludicrous. Of course they`re losing millions because the music they`re putting out is so great, right? Yeah, the last time I bought a CD was about ten years ago and it sure as hell wasn`t because I couldn`t get a free copy, it`s because I thought the band kicked butt (Nirvana, yeah I know, so kick me) But since that time, nothing I`ve heard has impressed in the slightest to make me want to buy a CD, and i know Im` not the only one. I don`t know many people who are lining up to buy the latest "kick ass Timberlake CD" WOW!
178 posted on 06/25/2003 9:37:41 PM PDT by metalboy (Liberals, what a dictator needs most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
We in the Curmudgeon Community do not appreciate being associated with persons of questionable character who are obviously short-fused; as a member in good standing, I believe I speak for the rest of us when I say, we believe in reason first, persuasion second and ostracism as a last resort.
179 posted on 06/25/2003 9:38:03 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wizzler
>>>>Except for making new, unauthorized copies

Really? Now I have about 20 years of making and having made copies of books and periodicals at the library. If the library did it, I had to have a copy of the cover.

Go figure!
180 posted on 06/25/2003 9:38:30 PM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson