[ladyinred]

I am not enamoured of Starr, but did you read any of the Starr report? It was not all about Monica as you have been led to believe. My reason for not being thrilled with him is that I am not so sure he was aggressive enough in prosecuting the real important things the Clinton's did.

[JoeSchem]

I am not enamoured of Starr, but did you read any of the Starr report? It was not all about Monica as you have been led to believe.

I'm really amazed at you guys and how you divert with differences that don't matter. Yes, the report wasn't all about Monica, but it was all about sex. Not a whiff about treason, and selling missile technology to China in exchange for campaign donations from Loral. Not a whiff.

And don't you think that's a shame? Don't you think there's something fishy about that? Don't you think that was flat out wrong?

Let's not split hairs. Starr had an opportunity to run Clinton out of town with bona fide treason charges, and instead he took the Just About Sex route, like he was getting instructions from James Carville on how to throw the fight.