[chichipow]

You do. There is no "scandal" here, as the headline writers try to point out.

I agree. It seems the Bush Admin was well on it's way to using the platform, but you know that Bush haters will use this as 'evidence' of complicity rather than a report chronicaling how close we were to pinching this guy before 9/11.

[nyconse]

Lets see, President Bush was sworn in on January 20th 2001. The Democrats had obstructed so long that the bare bones of the cabinet were barely in place. He wasn't in office during the fall of 2000. The point of this article is what?

Clinton on the other hand was offered Bin Laden on a silver plate: no bombs no mess. I think we should continue to blame Clinton for 9-11.