Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lou Dobbs: Thought Police Banning Words in Schools at "Alarming Rate"
Newsmax.com ^ | 06-24-03 | Dobbs, Lou

Posted on 06/24/2003 7:24:20 AM PDT by Theodore R.

Dobbs: Schools Banning Words at 'Alarming Rate'

Political correctness has so infected the government schools that classroom textbooks are now vetted for bad words and phrases that may upset people.

Lou Dobbs reported Monday night on his CNN program that "the list of words and phrases now banned in American classrooms is rising at an alarming rate."

"You may be surprised" to find out the innocent words and phrases now being deemed inadmissible in a classroom, Dobbs said.

Dobbs' launch pad was author and education expert Diane Ravitch's new book, "The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn."

Here are some examples from Ravitch's work:

"Anchorman" is a no go. Sorry, Lou, it's sexist!

Forget about mentioning "Adam and Eve." The P.C. crowd says it should be "Eve and Adam to demonstrate males do not take priority over females."

"Abnormal. Banned as demeaning to persons with disabilities."

Ravitch says the thought police at schoolbook publishers even issue "bias guidelines" to enforce their edicts.

Textbooks have been disinfected of such words as "actress or businessman or salesman, or founding fathers or brotherhood."

Ravitch explains that banned words and phrases are removed because, as the P.C. crowd argues, "these are either sexist words or age-biased words, or someone will find them offensive."

The thought police, according to Ravitch, have also been busy "rewriting classic literature, dropping phrases and words because there were words like 'God' that weren't allowed, even though it appeared in the works of Eli Wiesel, or Isaac Bashevis Singer."

One explanation for the growing censorship in the schoolbook publishing market: four publishing companies dominate 75 percent of the market.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 1984; dianeravitch; dobbs; doublespeak; education; governmentschools; indoctrination; language; languagepolice; newspeak; pc; schools; textbooks; thoughtpolice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
No matter how many Republicans or conservatives get elected, PC continues forward, forward, forward.
1 posted on 06/24/2003 7:24:21 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The only reason CNN doesn't ban Lou Dobbs is because they're hoping that people watching him will think they're watching FoxNews.
2 posted on 06/24/2003 7:27:59 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
You mean we can be fired for saying the word "booger"?


3 posted on 06/24/2003 7:30:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
People must get involved in their local PTO. Fight this revisionism by fighting the Nazi's publishing this crap. You will also have to fight the teacher's unions who tend to support the whole thing. Elected officials will not stop this because it's too low on the radar screen. Is it right that it's low? Heck no it is an assault at the very roots of our culture. The long term damage is insurmountable but the effects are already apparent.
4 posted on 06/24/2003 7:31:29 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The P.C. crowd says it should be "Eve and Adam to demonstrate males do not take priority over females."

How about "Evade'em"?

5 posted on 06/24/2003 7:32:01 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
"1984" was not a prophetic fiction novel.

"1984" was a training manual for liberals.

6 posted on 06/24/2003 7:33:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Doublespeak, we are here!
7 posted on 06/24/2003 7:33:40 AM PDT by Maigrey (Member of the Dose's Jesus Freaks and Gonzo News Service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
You actually thought they wouldn't take the opportunity to pull their own varient of "blue-nose" crap?
8 posted on 06/24/2003 7:36:36 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Liberals first, and now the neo-cons who are adopting the liberal agenda at a record setting pace.
9 posted on 06/24/2003 7:37:13 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You've got that right. Maybe we should use Animal Farm as the counter Lib manual. Two legs bad four legs good. Or maybe we could use Animal House and put everyone on double secret probation.
10 posted on 06/24/2003 7:38:38 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Lou Dobbs reported Monday night on his CNN program that "the list of words and phrases now banned in American classrooms is rising at an alarming rate."
That's so gay.
11 posted on 06/24/2003 7:39:37 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"1984" was a training manual for liberals.

bttt

12 posted on 06/24/2003 7:40:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I suppose it could be called red-nose.
13 posted on 06/24/2003 7:40:35 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Here I was all this time thinking that it was "Animal Farm".

I guess what threw me off was their remarkable resemblence to swine.

14 posted on 06/24/2003 7:41:23 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Ravitch explains that banned words and phrases are removed because, as the P.C. crowd argues, "these are either sexist words or age-biased words, or someone will find them offensive."

I guess they don't care if anyone finds their removal of such words offensive.

We are really screwing up a whole generation.

15 posted on 06/24/2003 7:45:27 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Newspeak.

I know of a certain unnamed corporation that forbade the term "blacklist" because its demeaning use of the word "black" might be offensive to negros (african-americans, whatever).
16 posted on 06/24/2003 7:51:04 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
My sister didn't believe me when I told her that we can no longer say "SNOWMAN" ! It is now "SNOWPERSON"....How the heck am I going to be able to sing now. I'll be LOL just after I sing "Frosty the ......

Probaly the whole song will be banned from singing soon with this line: "We led him down the streets of town, right to the traffic cop....we only paused a moment when we heard him hollar STOP." oH, we're in trouble now - being Prejudice - stopping snowpersons now !!! (just a little of my nutty humor folks.)

There were a few post a while ago with a list of these words. Does anyone have the list ?

thanks, Karen

17 posted on 06/24/2003 7:58:30 AM PDT by KE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
Actually that would be 'Newspeak' a new language made to be more efficient by actually REDUCING the number of words in the language. Also protects the people by eliminating the possibility of speaking of asubject that violates the PC orthodoxy. For example there would be no such word as 'steal' or 'thief' in Newspeak because the thought precedes the crime. Therefore, both of those words would be covered under the single word 'crimethink'.

What you're speaking of is 'doublethink' a method of thinking that enables the thinker to hold diametrically opposed points of view simultaneously, to believe in both to the depths of their being, and to be able to drop either one or both the minute it no longer becomes useful, not remembering at all that 10 minutes ago it was the most deeply held conviction. Another commonly practiced liberal-communist tactic.
18 posted on 06/24/2003 7:59:01 AM PDT by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of American Anger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
No matter how many Republicans or conservatives get elected, PC continues forward, forward, forward.

IMO if Christian men in this country would stand up for the truth...PC would come to an end.

19 posted on 06/24/2003 7:59:43 AM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
As long as Liberals control the language, America will continue her decline.

Electing conservative politicians does little good in the long run.

20 posted on 06/24/2003 8:01:44 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson