1 posted on
06/23/2003 7:35:23 PM PDT by
Coleus
To: *bang_list; PaulNYC; tsomer; Mixer; MattinNJ; OceanKing; TomT in NJ; Coleus; agrace; ...
`
2 posted on
06/23/2003 7:38:47 PM PDT by
Coleus
(God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
To: Coleus
Since when is GOA an affiliate of the NRA??
3 posted on
06/23/2003 7:45:54 PM PDT by
Tatze
(Give Pizza Chants!)
To: Coleus
Police Chief William Bratton argued these weapons are dangerous and serve no legitimate purpose. It's not about legitimate purposes, and even if it were, who the hell does the non-elected public employee, Chief Bratton, think he is to determine what is, and what is not, "legitimate"? "Shall not be infringed", doesn't say anthing about "legitimate", for which they really mean "legitimate sporting", purposes.
Actually a .50 BMG rifle would have come in right handy when those armor wearing bank robbers were spraying bullets hither and yon in the Chief's jurisdiction a few years ago.
6 posted on
06/23/2003 7:57:41 PM PDT by
El Gato
To: Coleus
The 2nd Amendment is becoming one of the few dwindling reasons I vote GOP.
7 posted on
06/23/2003 8:01:44 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Coleus
If ignorance is bliss, then this writer has got to be one of the happiest people around. The GOA is not an 'affiliate' of the NRA.
To: Coleus
Once again the intellectually dense attempt to shift the focus toward inanimate objects. I don't know of anyone sane who regards firearms as "sacred." I certainly don't. What I consider "sacred" is a list of rights, among which only one is the right to own the means of self-defense from persons or from the State, that persons such as the author would lightly dismiss in the pathetic desire to feel safer, in the ridiculous masquerade of being "empowered" enough to do something about violence when all he really intends to do is apply that violence in a slightly different form to perfectly honest citizens he has decided to demonize.
To: Coleus
This is my key issue when selecting a politician to vote for.
It's not my only issue buut it is my key issue.
If a politician doesn't trust me enough to let me carry a gun I don't trust them enough to cast a vote for me in the legislature.
13 posted on
06/23/2003 8:31:45 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: All
19 posted on
06/24/2003 12:38:40 AM PDT by
backhoe
(What part about "uninfringed" is so hard to understand? The 2nd guards the 1st...)
To: Coleus
Ugh. This thread could use a Barf Alert. Luckily, I haven't had breakfast yet.
20 posted on
06/24/2003 4:27:17 AM PDT by
wysiwyg
(What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
To: Coleus
Leaders of Gun Owners of America, a National Rifle Association affiliateI went no further than this statement. Why waste time reading anything else he "thinks?"
34 posted on
06/24/2003 12:59:20 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
("Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know." (I'm in the 2nd group.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson