Skip to comments.
Bush's Medicare Gamble-Some Republicans are starting to doubt the wisdom of a vast new entitlement.
Wall St Journal ^
| 6-23-03
Posted on 06/23/2003 5:34:23 AM PDT by SJackson
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The White House is mounting a full-court press to get a Medicare drug benefit through Congress by the Fourth of July. But Republican backbenchers are finally starting to question whether it's prudent to rush into law the greatest expansion of the welfare state since 1965.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: afghancaves; medicare; prescriptiondrugs; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
06/23/2003 5:34:23 AM PDT
by
SJackson
To: Torie
WSJ on drug dealing in the US Senate.
2
posted on
06/23/2003 5:37:19 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
GOP gets cold feet when Ted Kennedy likes it...
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Its time to kill it. This is not the time to expand the size of the federal government. Besides Republicans will never be as good as Democrats at buying votes from those who would look first to the government to take of all their needs.
4
posted on
06/23/2003 5:43:02 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: jwalsh07
This fiasco is Bush's doing, trying to buy the next election.
5
posted on
06/23/2003 5:44:34 AM PDT
by
LarryM
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Everyone: CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES. (I think the Senate is a lost cause here). The House can still stop this monstrosity. Believe me, phone calls help.
6
posted on
06/23/2003 5:55:43 AM PDT
by
LS
To: SJackson
President Bush may think the short-term political payoff in 2004 is worth this giant roll of the dice. But he's gambling here with someone else's money, in particular an estimated $7.5 trillion in new taxpayer liabilities, and that is simply reckless government. I hope Bush realizes that he might win a few votes from the democrats/socialists by outdoing their party but he's liable to lose a few non-socialists votes. There are still some of us left.
7
posted on
06/23/2003 5:56:04 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Realistically speaking, its a can't lose situation for Bush. What are conservatives going to do, vote Democrat?
8
posted on
06/23/2003 5:57:42 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
If he pisses enough of us off we could stay at home in 2004.
9
posted on
06/23/2003 5:59:05 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: LS
http://www.house.gov http://www.senate.gov Contact your Senators also, they need to know that they will be on the firing lines over this. I will not elect a Dem for President, but I will gladly boot out my Senators and Congressmen over this. They need to know how the majority of people really feel about this HUGE spending project.
Higher spending than Clinton. He ought to be embarassed by that!
10
posted on
06/23/2003 5:59:56 AM PDT
by
eyespysomething
(Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
To: goldstategop
Doubt it. The GOP faithful will grin and bear it. Gotta "win" after all.
11
posted on
06/23/2003 6:01:45 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
There are other parties some Conservatives might be looking at ---what's the point in voting for a Socialist if you don't believe in Socialism?
12
posted on
06/23/2003 6:03:07 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Wolfie
And wait till Bush turns half our Social Security over to Mexico's President Fox.
13
posted on
06/23/2003 6:04:28 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Wolfie
Realistically speaking, its a can't lose situation for Bush. What are conservatives going to do, vote Democrat? yeah, that thinking served GHWB real well. "Screw'em I'll raise taxes, what are they gonna do." He found out.
To: SJackson
Senator Kennedy let it slip the other day on C-SPAN that two-thirds of the cost of the Senate prescription drug plan would be paid out of general revenues. The monthly premium, deductible and co-pay will only cover about 33% of the cost.
Time to stop this train-wreck before it leaves the station.
15
posted on
06/23/2003 6:07:15 AM PDT
by
jackbill
To: Wolfie
"The GOP faithful will grin and bear it." Not this one, and I doubt that I'm alone.
To: jackbill
Yup. If this prescription benefit is so vital, eligible recipients should pay two thirds of the cost.
17
posted on
06/23/2003 6:08:34 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: SJackson
www.constitutionparty.com
18
posted on
06/23/2003 6:09:14 AM PDT
by
Ahban
To: Eric in the Ozarks
GOP gets cold feet when Ted Kennedy likes it...
I get cold feet when all it amounts to is one more hand in my pocket - stealing cash I don't want to have stolen to pay people I don't want to pay.
To: AD from SpringBay
We're talking about adding a new entitlement benefit BEFORE even considering reforming the Medicare program. Aren't we putting the horse before the cart? It sure looks that way to this observer.
20
posted on
06/23/2003 6:11:36 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson