1 posted on
06/23/2003 2:49:32 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
This is a lesson to all of us who think Junk Science is funny that the cost of ignorance is always heavy.
2 posted on
06/23/2003 2:56:09 AM PDT by
Gorzaloon
(Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
To: kattracks
Coming next to a legislature near you -
An additional tax on beans, beer, burritos, chili,
3 posted on
06/23/2003 2:58:33 AM PDT by
R. Scott
To: kattracks
To NZ Parliament:
Use Beano.
Now can I collect my $4.9 mil?
Note the pattern: it ain't about reducing falsely labeled "greenhouse gases". It's about adding fresh revenue to the gummit coffers.
6 posted on
06/23/2003 4:41:55 AM PDT by
Ole Okie
To: kattracks; dixiechick2000
What will they think of next?
7 posted on
06/23/2003 4:52:27 AM PDT by
WKB
To: kattracks
Perhaps the desire to avoid this tax will lead to the development of a method to collect and utilize this valuable resource. Someday we may all fill our tanks with, well, gas.
It's an ill wind that blows no good.
To: kattracks
"The center-left government, which supports the Kyoto Protocol, wants to use the money raised - about $4.9 million a year - to fund research into ways of minimizing the impact that the country's cattle and sheep population are allegedly having on the planet's climate."
I has no effect whatsovever, don't worry about it.
That'll be 4.9 Million NZ please....
Paypal?
To: kattracks
bttt
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
So how can we tie Democrats to Kyoto to the Fart Tax without looking mean spirited?
28 posted on
06/24/2003 4:17:16 PM PDT by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson