Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hagel: Iraqi WMD Clouds Bush Credibility
Associated Press ^ | June 22, 2003 | Jennifer C. Kerr

Posted on 06/22/2003 2:50:51 PM PDT by AntiGuv

WASHINGTON - The question of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction has left a cloud over the Bush administration's credibility that won't be removed until Americans know whether the administration was straightforward with them, a Republican member of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Sunday.

At the same time, the committee's chairman and its senior Democrat said it is too early to say whether prewar weapons intelligence was manipulated or hyped before the U.S.-led invasion in March, as some Democrats have suggested.

The committee began last week an inquiry into the administration's use of intelligence to justify the invasion, specifically assertions that President Saddam Hussein had thriving programs to develop chemical and biological weapons and had tried to obtain material for nuclear arms.

Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., said the administration is cooperating with the committee hearings, and he expects the cooperation to continue.

"This is a cloud hanging over their credibility, their word," said Hagel. "They need to get that dealt with, taken care of, removed."

Hagel, who spoke on ABC's "This Week" program, said: "The world — certainly Americans — must have confidence in this administration. ... And to resolve this issue is certainly in the interests of this administration."

The Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts, said he had seen no evidence in the hearings' early going of any manipulation or other questionable administration tactics, but his panel hopes to answer that question once and for all.

"That's why we have all of the voluminous material from the ceiling to the floor from the CIA," the Kansas Republican said.

The panel's top Democrat, Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, said he does not know whether intelligence may have been exaggerated to bolster the administration's case for going to war, but he added that he has misgivings over the possibility.

Rockefeller pointed to claims that Iraq sought uranium from Africa, which were later determined to be based on forged documents that came to the CIA through Italian and British agencies. President Bush mentioned the purported Niger-Iraq connection in his State of the Union address, apparently after the forgery had been discovered.

For now, Rockefeller said, "I am not going to conclude from that that the president was deliberately misleading."

Rockefeller and Roberts both appeared on "Fox News Sunday."

Their committee held one secret session last week. Roberts said three more hearings are planned, and they probably will be followed by an open hearing, which Democrats have demanded.

"At the end of it, doubtlessly, we will have a public hearing. We'll make a public report and probably a classified report," Roberts said.

The House Intelligence Committee is conducting a similar review on prewar weapons assessments, as is the Senate Armed Services Committee.

More than two months after the fall of Baghdad, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq, which has raised questions about the Bush administration's primary justification for invading.

Until recently, Bush and his aides had maintained prohibited weapons would be found. In his radio address Saturday, Bush made no such promise and said instead that documents and suspected weapons sites were looted and burned "in the regime's final days."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: bush; credibility; hagel; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2003 2:50:51 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Hagel is a complete jerk. Every time he opens his mouth he says something dumb but "sensitive."
2 posted on 06/22/2003 2:55:19 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett
I think it is National Review that refers to him as "Senator Chuck Hagel, R-France."
3 posted on 06/22/2003 2:59:07 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Hagel is a complete jerk.

What is it with this guy, anyway?

He and Lugar, always shooting off their mouths.

You know what I think it is? They are jealous as hell of Bush. Hegel's been slugging around in local and Senate politics for years. Bush comes out of nowhere and gets elected President, while Chuckie's still laboring in anonymity,except for his statements, which are guaranteed to get him on the talk shows.

Plain old jealousy.

4 posted on 06/22/2003 2:59:33 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
"This is a cloud hanging over their credibility, their word,"

I love Nebraska but Chuck is an idiot. When it was popular, he was being photgraphed all over the place with Dubya and supporting the war effort. He and McCain are sisters, aren't they?

5 posted on 06/22/2003 2:59:47 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (Ya know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101
I would refer everyone here:
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2003/060403.htm


6 posted on 06/22/2003 3:04:47 PM PDT by Gringo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101
Ah....I remember the days when freepers thought that it was "idiots" who refused to investigate potential scandals and abuse of power. Now, the "idiots" are those who dare to ask questions!
7 posted on 06/22/2003 3:06:40 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I need a beer. I thought the headline meant THIS Hegel.


8 posted on 06/22/2003 3:09:48 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He [Hagel] and Lugar, always shooting off their mouths.

I don't really lump Hagel in with Lugar, whom I disagree with on occasion but nevertheless respect.

Hagel may be motivated by jealousy, as you say, or he may have a sort of maverick or knight on a white horse complex -- a windmill tilter. Usually such traits are more suited to Demos, so I think it would be an interesting project to really explore the roots of his affiliation with the Republican Party. Interesting, that is, if I gave a damn about the guy, which I don't.

9 posted on 06/22/2003 3:11:39 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
I wasn't here at the time, but I have to agree that the lack of WMD sends a cloud over the entire Iraq liberation. The sad thing is, it was a SELF-INFLICTED WOUND!

Many, perhaps most, of us would have supported the war as a way to topple a brutal dictator who has menaced and murdered his own people, and who had given insufficient information about his disposal of WMD. It was President Bush -- and Secretary Powell -- who made the WMD themselves the issue with their statements about imminent usability of these weapons.

How are we ever going to get world support to take out, say, Iran or Syria for WMD if we can't pinpoint how our intelligence services screwed up so badly now. It would be a true tragedy if, having done the right thing by liberating Iraq, we are now in the position of the boy who cried wolf, never to be believed again when another horrific despot gathers the means to kill tens or hundreds of thousands of people at a time.

I pray that these weapons are found.
10 posted on 06/22/2003 3:13:12 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Interesting, that is, if I gave a damn about the guy, which I don't.

LOL!! That sums up my feelings as well.

11 posted on 06/22/2003 3:14:04 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Everytime I see this guy I walk away wondering what he said... I think he is the media's token Republican idiot that they roll out to look stupid.
12 posted on 06/22/2003 3:14:07 PM PDT by Bob Eimiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Hey, don'tcha know. Chuck Hagel is an independent thinker.

Hmmm. Make that independent stinker.

Better yet, make that a jerk face stinker.

13 posted on 06/22/2003 3:21:27 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I believe this McCain backer want to be President someday. He's got a pretty face but is completely milquetoast on the issues.
14 posted on 06/22/2003 3:22:36 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Ah....I remember the days when freepers thought that it was "idiots" who refused to investigate potential scandals and abuse of power. Now, the "idiots" are those who dare to ask questions!

Perhaps freepers are intelligent enough to recognize disingenuous questions???

15 posted on 06/22/2003 3:26:27 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Ouch....not so. I don't care about the investigation. Cross my heart and swear to God. It's wishy-washy Chuck Hagel. Give me Tom Osborne any day of the week.
16 posted on 06/22/2003 3:40:28 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (Ya know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
I pray that these weapons are found.

I believe quite strongly that they will be found.

Saddam got unmistakable signals before the official start of the war that the Americans were coming in. Just yesterday it was revealed by Gen. Franks that fiber optic cable control centers which had been left untouched in all the time since the end of Gulf War I and which controlled cables Saddam and his leadership team used for secure communication, were taken out in secret operations by F-18 pilots weeks before ground troops went in. That should have been a hint to Saddam that this time was different.

My point is that Saddam had ample time during the weeks of brinksmanship to read the tea leaves and realize that George Bush was dead serious and that American troops were coming in. No doubt once he knew his regime was toast, he turned his mind to figuring out how best to frustrate and embarrass us after the war. The #1 way, quite obviously, would be to destroy as much illegal weaponry as he could so that it looked like he never had the stuff in the first place. Most of it was probably destroyed in January or February.

Does this mean he got it all? No. We will find some of it. And while we may not find the bulk of what he destroyed just prior to the war, we will find the people who did the destroying. In dribs and drabs, as they realize it's in their self-interest to do so (which may not be completely clear to them yet), the weapons destroyers will help us put the pieces together and present to the world an irrefutable case that Saddam Hussein was in possession of illegal stockpiles of WMDs until as late as January 2003, and that the case against Saddam which Bush presented to the world was largely accurate.

And who knows, maybe one of these people will be able to tell us the location of an actual stockpile, or its remnants, from which good forensic evidence can be obtained.

It's still much too early to say we're never going to find this stuff.

17 posted on 06/22/2003 3:41:22 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
This from a guy that supported McLame in the 2000 primary.
18 posted on 06/22/2003 3:47:55 PM PDT by aynrandfreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

19 posted on 06/22/2003 3:49:23 PM PDT by Helms (The Democrats are the Official Party of the “blue pill”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
in other news, the sky is blue, water is wet and fire is hot...
20 posted on 06/22/2003 3:53:09 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector (Eagles may soar, but pigs don't get sucked into jet engines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson