Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fso301
Agreed on the probable composition. However, rates of coral growth and sedimentation/scouring of sediments cannot be assumed to be constant. Wood may or may not have provided appropriate anchor points for coral if the wood was covered with sediment rapidly, and the amount of coral growth is dependant on numerous factors as well. Too many variables in the equation.

You are right about burial, but the mechanism of closing walls of water could have provided plenty of suspended sediment with no prevailing current.

Coral growth and sedimentation could be significant, or nearly negligable; the conditions which would promote organic decay (water circulation, nutrient flow, oxygenation) would also enhance coral growth to a point. They are not a given, however. Even so, encrustation of wooden artifacts should provide even crude molds, which properly found and investigated, should yield at least the gross morphology of the void space, and thus, be identifiable to some degree. Wood has survived long internment under water in the proper conditions, though little known to be from this era.

If this is a shipwreck, there should be evidence of cargo, ballast, and a ship, with some fittings unique to that (maritime) venue. The debris field should be limited in size (by the size of the vessel).

If an army on the march, another assemblage of artifacts would be expected of a more terrestrial bent, one significantly larger than a ship could contain, and dispersed in such a fashion that would make a maritime source unlikely.

Imagine drowning a large force of foot soldiers, horse, and chariots. Even if the chariots were made from wood too dense to float, or adorned/fitted heavily eonugh to stay submerged, only the soldiers encumbred by sufficient goods, armor, or weapons to hold their bodies on the bottom after bloating would stay in place. Putrefaction, bloating, and a west wind could have delivered numerous weapons into the hands of the Hebrews, literally coming ashore.

I was thinking, though that any force of significant size should have contained a fair metallic component in the debris, (clasps, buckles, ornaments, if not weapons, (projectile points, etc.) In the absence of ferrous metals, (no magnetic anomaly), this might be tougher to detect, but there should still be a substantial amount of material which should have been left on the bottom.

Politics of the region will likely make thorough investigation difficult, if not impossible, which is a pity. This is intriguing as an archaeological problem, the potential religious significance is astounding.

112 posted on 06/21/2003 10:59:24 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Interesting points. Somehow I don't think the Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities will be particularly interested in assigning a marine archaeological team to the case. The bureaucratic red tape will be impossibly sticky and tough for anyone else wanting to investigate the site.
121 posted on 06/22/2003 6:15:53 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson