Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T; backhoe; piasa; Richard Poe; All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rTKLEJ5qRs

"Hillary Care"
(Added March 27, 2007)

===
===

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6760676182513210949&pr=goog-sl

"Hillary's Health Care"
(Added March 27, 2007)


229 posted on 03/27/2007 6:14:29 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: backhoe; piasa; All

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200703/POL20070327b.html

"Senator Clinton's Lawyers Seek to Halt Fraud Suit"
By Fred Lucas
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 27, 2007

ARTICLE SNIPPET: "(CNSNews.com) - Attorneys for Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) are trying to keep her out of a lawsuit that may ultimately force her to testify under oath about an alleged violation of campaign finance laws.

Washington lawyers David Kendall and Carolyn Utrecht and Los Angeles attorney Jan B. Norman -- all representing the apparent frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination -- filed legal briefs Friday in the California Court of Appeals focusing heavily on the criminal background of plaintiff Peter Paul, the Hollywood businessman who is suing both Bill and Hillary Clinton and others.

Paul alleges that fraudulent actions by the Clintons and others cost him his multi-million dollar Internet venture. Paul claims to have been the largest contributor to Sen. Clinton's U.S. Senate campaign, spending $1.9 million to hold a 2000 fundraising gala attended by Hollywood celebrities including Whoopi Goldberg, John Travolta and Brad Pitt.

In return, Paul claims, then-President Bill Clinton promised to promote the firm. However, the president allegedly reneged on the commitment after his wife was elected in November of that year and used his influence to discourage others from investing in the firm.

In an effort to stay out of the suit, Sen. Clinton used a California statute intended to protect a political candidate's First Amendment rights from frivolous lawsuits. A California Superior Court judge dismissed her from the lawsuit on those grounds last fall, but Paul appealed in January, contending the California statute does not protect Sen. Clinton from alleged illegal activity.

The Friday brief was a response to the appeal."


230 posted on 03/28/2007 1:19:13 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson