Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/19/2003 11:57:50 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bedolido
Orphanages are probably better than foster families -- many of whom are not normal, married couples and too many of of whom are in it for money.
2 posted on 06/19/2003 11:59:50 AM PDT by Temple Drake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
"...please sir... can i have some more?"
3 posted on 06/19/2003 12:02:10 PM PDT by conservativeinbflo.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
SITREP
4 posted on 06/19/2003 12:08:43 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
But they couldn't change the facts: Institutional care is bad for kids.

So is parental and step-parental abuse and neglect.

5 posted on 06/19/2003 12:09:12 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
What would be easier for a case worker to regulate? 100 foster homes on his case load, or one orphanage with 100 kids? Hell the guy could just camp there every day.

I think that for those kids who aren't adopted, an orphanage might be a better option if it is well run. Kids in foster homes get lost in the system.

6 posted on 06/19/2003 12:11:21 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
There should be a nation-wide poll, and everyone that is pro-life should have an orphan assigned to them.
7 posted on 06/19/2003 12:13:10 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Well this is interesting give that I just had a discussion on another thread in which some advocate the State taking away children from their parents, not for abuse, but because they are poor.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/930740/posts?page=280#280

So rather than financially helping out a poor parent, some advocate taking their children away. Of course, we'd still have to collect taxes to pay for the upkeep of kids who won't be adopted. In the meantime, they lose their biological parent as well.
8 posted on 06/19/2003 12:16:04 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Do boarding schools where the rich who do not want to be bothered with the rigors of rearing their own children send their children count as institutionalized care? If not, it should. It is basically the same if not worse. As to institutionalized care, the cottage homes are very similar to a large family and I think better than living in an orphanage of Dicken's day by far.
10 posted on 06/19/2003 12:19:14 PM PDT by waRNmother.armyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
I have mixed emotions about orphanages

My sister was 6 & I was 8 when we were put in an orphanage. I stayed until I graduated from High School.

I HAD a lot of resent about the treatment I (and every other kid) received.

Nuns took care of the raising of the kids. There were house mothers and teachers. The house mothers provided for our well-being. We were well fed, clothed and disciplined.

The teachers were, well.. teachers. In High School, we went to school half days and learned a trade the other half of the day. The rest of the school day was finished at night, after supper.

We had our own bakery, shoemaker, doctors, florist/greenhouse, paint shop, print shop, garage, kitchen powerhouse, carpenter shop

Life was pseudo-military. In grammar school, we lived 30 to a cottage, 1st graders through 8th graders. Sleeping areas were dormitories. Movements were by formations. Everyone had chores.

Discipline mostly consisted of harsh corporal punishment.

In reflection of my life, over time, my resentment has turned into being gratefull. I have no idea what would have happened to my sister and I had we not been sent to the orphanage.

Maybe there is a way to provide the same types of things I was able to experience...without the discipline & military blurprint.
13 posted on 06/19/2003 12:23:43 PM PDT by stylin19a (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
used for family-preservation services.

What a novel idea.

23 posted on 06/19/2003 12:59:05 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
I hope so. For all their problems there is a lot more oversight and instillation of good values in the orphanage system.
47 posted on 06/19/2003 3:29:31 PM PDT by mlmr (The chickens always come home to roost........unless they are eaten by the racoons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson