Posted on 06/19/2003 6:48:02 AM PDT by boris
CALIFORNIA lost 21,500 jobs last month - more than the rest of the country combined. The largest title insurer in the country, Fidelity National Financial, announced it is moving its headquarters from Southern California to Florida.
Buck Knives, a longtime Southern California business, recently announced it is moving to Idaho. Yes, Idaho.
When compared to other states, once-invincible California now suffers from a "competitiveness crisis" that is draining our economic vitality and threatening the state's long-term fiscal health.
And the way the budget debate is being handled, it is only going to get worse.
Last month Forbes ranked the "Best Cities for Business" and California took a major hit. In 2002, California had dominated the list - the two best cities in the United States for business were both in California (San Diego and Santa Rosa) and six of the top 10 cities were from this state.
Now, just one year later, California's highest-ranking city, Santa Rosa, is 23rd. Los Angeles is not even in the top 125 - falling from number 100 in 2002 to 126 this year, and Ventura plummeted from 4th to 67th.
Why did the state tumble down the ratings? And why are so many businesses fleeing Southern California with its highly trained labor pool, access to international trade and abundant natural resources?
For starters, the state's tax and regulatory structure is crippling industry. A new study by the Tax Foundation ranked California 49th - only Mississippi is worse in terms of its business tax climate.
But it isn't just taxes, California is plummeting across the board: California companies pay three times as much for workers' compensation as in neighboring Arizona. The state boasts some of the highest retail energy rates in the nation and yet has less reliability (remember those blackouts?), and gridlocked Los Angeles has fewer miles of freeway per capita than most major metropolitan areas.
In nearly universal fashion, California taxpayers and businesses pay more for less. Ideally, the budget crisis would have been viewed as a fantastic opportunity to reverse this trend by fundamentally reforming state government.
Instead, we are getting the same old, same old - we must raise taxes and cut vital, quality-of-life services like education and social services.
But let's think about this for a second. What will happen to our competitiveness if we increase the price of government (increase taxes) and reduce the delivery of services (cut quality-of-life programs)?
Californians will be paying even more for even less. And you can hear those moving vans carrying companies out of the state as fast as they can.
To rescue California from this predicament, state lawmakers must view the deficit through the lens of fundamental reform. They must confront some of the state's most powerful political forces - no more pork for prison guards, straightforward performance-oriented contracts with teachers unions, and so on.
Our public services should be subject to regular competition between government providers, nonprofits and private businesses.
If a state worker is mowing the grass in front of a state building, let's find out if a local landscaping company would provide the service at a lower cost.
Every time we go to the grocery store we find sale items and bargains illustrating how competition improves quality and reduces costs.
Public employee unions will undoubtedly fight reforms, but the grave consequences of inaction are greater than their political goals.
It is dumbfounding that the Golden State finds itself competing with Idaho and Mississippi for businesses. But that's our new reality.
Fortunately, facing this reality and committing to fundamental economic reform and increased competitiveness will lead California to brighter days.
So the next time somebody says the budget crisis should be confronted with a "balanced" approach of tax increases and service cuts, suggest they talk to the former employees of Buck Knives whose jobs moved to Idaho.
Better yet, suggest they ask Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne what he thinks about California's budget plan. I bet he is a big fan.
George Passantino is director of government affairs at Reason Foundation, a Los Angeles think tank.
Yes, indeed, wise sage. Compared to other states, California's taxes and regulations are simply too onerous to tolerate anymore.
BUSINESSES moving out...
What's wrong with this picture?
It's sad to see California and the people still living there suffering the consequences of decades of bad governmental decision making and governmental greed, but that will only last so long. The writing is on the wall and only drastic, pro-market changes will reverse its course now.
You must have read my profile. ROFLMAO
It's exactly this reason that has our neighbors (very successful small underground contracting firm)in Texas at this very moment, poking around property prices etc.
Now get this... despite a so-called "hiring freeze", in the month of May alone, the State of California added 2,900 people to the state payroll!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm trapped here. My job is here (making noises of moving to Alabama) and I am nearing retirement.
My medical conditions require that I live in a large city with excellent medical facilities.
I was born in Baltimore and I could move back (were I to win the lottery)--Johns Hopkins fits the bill.
My dream is to retire to New Hampshire...but it will probably never happen. They'll wheel me out of here feet first.
--Boris
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.