[XBob]

633 - "We can talk about death now, but that doesn't mean death existed when God was alone."

You can't even prove the existence of god, let alone that he was 'alone', so your analogy is inappropriate.

[Tailgunner Joe]

You are really ignorant. You think a fetus is "a single cell" and you equate natural and unpreventable miscarriage with intentional abortion. You need to take a biology class.

[mommadooo3]

Bob, I have stayed 'out' of this thread, reading on the sidelines. And I HAVE to say you're not that cold. FReep mail me if there's time for you.

[syriacus]

Your post 17:

Mama - you have a strange god who kills 40% of all humans beings (your definition of a fertilized egg) before they even get to be a fetus. What a cruel god you have.

Your post 633:

You can't even prove the existence of god, let alone that he was 'alone', so your analogy is inappropriate.

---

Why the change of heart about discussing God?

You have been perfectly willing to discuss god/God in several posts here.

In Post 17, you were content to posit that He is so cruel that He uses his immense, far-reaching, supernatural powers to kill "40% of all human beings before they even get to a fetus."

But you aren't content with the idea that, if a Being has long-distance power to kill those fetuses, that same Being might be powerful enough to have created mankind. In that case, He would have existed before mankind brought human death into the world.

I can see why you are an agnostic.

I'd be an agnostic, too, if I thought God could be so cruel. The idea of worshipping a god who doesn't bring life to mankind, but only uses his powers to kill fetuses is repugnant.

Abortion is repugnant, too.