Skip to comments.
VIACOM: SPIKE SUIT COSTING US A FORTUNE
New York Post ^
| 6/18/03
| DAREH GREGORIAN
Posted on 06/18/2003 3:47:15 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:14:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
That's the amount of cash The National Network says it has lost by not being allowed to change its name to Spike TV - and the network fears it could wind up losing "hundreds of millions of dollars" more.
TNN, owned by Sumner Redstone's Viacom Inc., made the claims yesterday in the state Appellate Division, where it is seeking to lift a lower court's temporary ban on the name change, which was supposed to go into effect this past Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
06/18/2003 3:47:15 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
All because of Spike Lee's massive ego. Disgusting.
To: BlessedBeGod
They're both hard lefties. Let them sue each other.
3
posted on
06/18/2003 4:20:01 AM PDT
by
Leisler
To: kattracks
Wait 'til Viacom sees how much it loses after the name change.
To: Leisler
Lefties still win, though. Lawyers get the $16 mil.
To: kattracks
Are railroads going to have change the name of the device that hold the rail to the tie?
6
posted on
06/18/2003 4:32:04 AM PDT
by
sticker
To: kattracks
"TNN "sought to exploit" his persona with the name Spike TV, which it had marketed as an "aggressive and irreverent" network for men.TNN President Albie Hecht "has conceded that Spike Lee was one of the role models for the network name,"
Who's zooming whom? Why didn't they just name it the Pee Wee Herman Network?
![](http://www.pbs.org/wnet/aaworld/reference/images/spike_lee.jpg)
![](http://www.upress.state.ms.us/img/books/spring2002/spike_lee.jpg)
To: kattracks
"VIACOM: SPIKE SUIT COSTING US A FORTUNE"
Where is the headline "VIACOM: Fake Hype for Hillary's Book Costing us a Fortune"
8
posted on
06/18/2003 5:10:19 AM PDT
by
UNGN
(I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
To: kattracks
Sumner Redstone is a sleazeball. No tears here.
To: kattracks
A good compromise would be to name a toilet "Spike"!
To: kattracks
He also found while "the word 'spike' has many meanings," the focus in this case is the word's use in "the film and television industry."
I hope they (Viacom) win. Even if those who came up with the idea thought of "Spike Lee" when they were brainstorming for a new name, there 'are' many meanings of the word "spike" in "the film and television industry." And this should not be the sole factor in deciding this case anyway.
The reason for this is that the name of a station is an advertising decision. A carefully made decision, I assume.
I find it more likely that they would NOT have used the name if they thought that everyone would first think of Spike Lee -- that would alienate some regular viewers of TNN right off the bat. They would want to keep thier regular viewers and gain more.
So I'm sure while they were brainstorming and expressing their freedom of 'word association', they discussed all the ways the word spike might attract men to their station. Men wear spikes on their sports shoes, they spike their footballs and volleyballs, they spike their drinks, they use spikes in contruction, see spikes on young antlers while hunting, some spike their hair and they like women in spiked high heels.
I am sure this decision was made after such a session of brainstorming and a presentation done to the powers that be by a team. Of course "Spike Lee" came up in this brainstorming session, of course he did. So what? He doesn't own the word "Spike" or the sole right to be irreverent and whatever the heck else he thinks he is.
Oh well, we'll see how this comes out.
To: RippleFire
Spike Lee would look so much better with a railroad spike driven into his forehead!
12
posted on
06/18/2003 5:28:52 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: kattracks
Aclaimed artist? Hey Spike, it's your friggen first name, it's not your ownly name. Are you saying not child can every be called Spike, no product can ever be called Spike and not entity can every be called Spike.
Hey all you Ron's out there, my attorny is on the phone.
Lee's publicity agent must be doing cartwheels right now.
Any judge that would buy into this is a moron.
To: kattracks
demeaning, vapid and quasi-pornographic contentSaid the pot to the kettle.
14
posted on
06/18/2003 6:05:33 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: kattracks
How about "Bruce TV"?
THAT has a ring.......!
Tia
15
posted on
06/18/2003 7:30:41 AM PDT
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: kattracks
>That's the amount of cash The National Network says it has lost by not being allowed to change its name to Spike TV - and the network fears it could wind up losing "hundreds of millions of dollars" more.
I think this is all
a big, fat, hairy-assed LIE.
Now think about this:
Millions of people
never would have heard of this
name changing business
if Spike hadn't sued.
Now, the network's getting TONS
of publicity
and even people
who don't get cable know it.
I believe lawsuits
are being used as
advertising gimmicks in
many media
driven cases. (Like
the whole Winona Ryder-
Saks Fifth Avenue
sequence of events.)
I think these are planned-out ways
of just getting press...
To: DoughtyOne
Hey Spike, it's your friggen first name, it's not your ownly name. "Spike" is not his real first name this self important P.O.S was born "Shelton Jackson Lee" in 1957. Who is he to reserve names of his choosing being named after a Southern Civil War Hero.
The descendents of band leader Spike Jones should sue Shelton Jackson Lee.
17
posted on
06/18/2003 8:03:22 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Soddom has left the bunker.)
To: BrooklynGOP
and at least 7 million of that will wind up in the Edwards campaign. Donated by clerks, interns and copy machine repair technicians, of course...
To: Mike Darancette
I agree. Our society is so f'd up. Why this piece of human refuse can raise this issue and actually get anyone to listen to him is beyond my understanding. Some judge is actually willing to allow him to cost the corporation millions for this flimsy reason. I doubt it cost the corp this much, but in truth I wouldn't be surprised if they are experiencing certain large losses.
To: kattracks
According to Google:
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:V5OVSpFl4fsC:www.vintageip.com/pics/gc01-spike-big.gif)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:---x_Pw832AC:www.starstore.com/acatalog/spike.jpg)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:2ux2CchEvQkC:www.cs.brown.edu/courses/cs017/img/spike.gif)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:qOye8xIrbYoC:www.draconisdesigns.com/portfolio/comicstore/beanies/spike.jpg)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:OT8rsYmZGHAC:members.tripod.com/~queenbeanie/spike.gif)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:FHQidF7L8r4C:www.avantgarb.com/mas_spike/spike.jpg)
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:Gnwee_wboO8C:peanutspost.com/images/books/spike.jpg)
Spike Lee didnt show up until page 5.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson