[Aric2000]

There is NOTHING flailing about the scientific community.

Flailing in the creationist community, YES, misquotes, questionable science, and I use that word LIGHTLY, because it VERY questionable, outright lies, etc.

Yeah, you can get ALL the doctorates that you need, but expect at least 75% of them to go with evolution, once they understand the truth and quit getting bombarded with propaganda from the creationist camp. The other 25% will be questioning, and then where will you be?

All those doctorates that you tried to get for the creationist camp will have decamped and moved to the other side and the rest will become unreliable.

Religion is religion, science is science, once you finally figure that out, the better off we will all be.

Young Earth, WRONG, the earth is over 4 billion years old, the universe, closer to 15 billion.

A worldwide flood catastrophy, WRONG, there is NO evidence that a worldwide flood of ANY nature occurred, let alone one that was a mile deep.

No transitionals, WRONG, there are thousands, you creationists just keep moving the goalposts.

Go for it, I would love to see more creationists go out and get an education, then we would no longer have to argue with them, because they would no longer be creationists.

[bondserv]

Fear not the Creationists perspective. Please reread the article before you say there is no slant to the scientific community.

Your venerated scientists often have agendas, or they aren't objective enough to think through all of the angles on any given discovery (especially from a design perspective).

[bondserv]

P.S. If you never want the answers to the tough questions, and wish to railroad those who are willing to ask them, can you claim there is an intellectually honest attempt to ascertain the truth?