Uhhh....I would bet the bank on that. PCUSA CHANGED their official Bibles to remove the part in Timothy where it mentions "Husband of one wife". Why? Because it goes against their beliefs.
I'm not jumping on you per se. Just on the belief of women's ordination. The ONLY reason I can find for it is self-serving. If you want to believe in it for purely social reasons, fine. No problem. No different from Campaign Finance Reform IMHO. It may go against the Constitution but people are willing to wave that off to get what they want. It only bothers me (and you I think) when people say "The Scripture is against it so I'll just change the Scripture to suit me". There's no need for that. It's not unChristian to believe in women's ordination but it is unChristian to change Scripture to suit your beliefs. We shouldn't be tempted by the greater sin. I've been guilty of that many times and it isn't healthy.
I don't ever seek to change or remove Scripture to suit my own position. EVER! The passage in Timothy is clear, but it is also in reference to male elders, so saying anything but "Husband of one wife" to talk about marital fidelity would have been nonsensical to those to whom it was written. As I said before, that, in and of itself, does not make the case that elders can never be women.
What I am saying is that there are absolute truths in Scripture, and there are also cultural directives, that need to be interpreted in cultural context, and we need to be very careful about how we understand them (after studying them with the understanding that God's word is inerrant).
For instance, the passage in 1 Corinthians 14:33-35, where Paul says that women should be silent in church (preceded by "God is a God, not of disorder, but of peace") specifically refered to the women of Corinth who were behaving inappropriately in church. That passage has been interpreted (incorrectly, IMO) to mean that only men should speak, pray, teach or talk in church. When I was young (in the 50's), it was a common interpretation that women shouldn't say a word in church, yet the Quakers in the 19th century had women lay pastors, and my own VERY conservative denomination had had women pastors during the Depression, but would NEVER have done so in the '50's or beyond. Different well meaning Christians interpret these passages very differently....... and what we need to do as believers is to delve deep to see what they really mean, and not just look at the surface. This is true of any area of faith.....like pre-destination, election, eternal security, works, sanctification, holiness, prophesy.....everything.
I seriously urge you, if you are a young Christian to be wary of those who claim to know what everything in Scripture means, down to the punctuation marks. They have stopped asking questions, of themselves, and of the Lord as to what His Word means, and that, IMO, is dangerous. There are far too many of those folks on FR.
But I accepted in OBEDIENCE to God. Be careful of your judgements.