Skip to comments.
Maureen Blair
National Review ^
| 06/15/03
| David Frum
Posted on 06/16/2003 7:07:53 AM PDT by Pokey78
Maureen Dowd seems to have learned nothing from the Jayson Blair fiasco. No, thats not quite right. She does seem to have learned one thing from the paper of records plagiarist of record. Fresh from the scandal of being caught abusing ellipses to twist President Bushs words, she is now using other peoples work to pad out a column when the deadline clock is tolling.
Yesterday, Dowd wrote one of her trademark gaseous columns about popular culture turning its back on the accomplishments of feminism, etc., etc.
As the column trudged wearily to its end, there unexpectedly appeared an unusual thought, vividly phrased: There's even a retro trend among women toward deserting the fast track for a pleasant life of sitting around Starbucks gabbing with their girlfriends, baby strollers beside them ...."
Now compare Dowds words to these, broadcast on National Public Radios Morning Edition two weeks ago:
You see them at Starbucks at two oclock on a weekday afternoon, pushing a stroller and balancing a latte, with a slight look of bewilderment on their faces, as if to say, How did I end up here?
Yet forty years after the launch of the womens movement, this is exactly what many former career women find themselves doing.
The broadcaster in question happened to be my wife, Danielle Crittenden, and the "trend" to which Dowd refers (in the late 1990s, the percentage of mothers of young children who worked dropped for the first time in a quarter century) provides the theme for Danielle's new novel.
Asked for comment about how she feels about playing Macarena Hernandez to Dowds Jayson Blair, Danielle said only, Be nice: Maybe she sent a stringer to the Starbucks to look around for her.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidfrum; deceit; jaysonblair; maureendowd; modotheplagiarist; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
06/16/2003 7:07:53 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
LOL! Amanda Bright at Home meets Maureen Dowd at Work.
2
posted on
06/16/2003 7:12:14 AM PDT
by
A_perfect_lady
(Let them eat cake.)
To: Pokey78
Dowd wil never win a Milky if she continues to paraphrase instead of copying word for word.
3
posted on
06/16/2003 7:17:16 AM PDT
by
per loin
To: Pokey78
Dowd is rapidly being exposed as one of those people who hears a good quip or interesting comment and saves it to drop as her own. Such people annoy the hell out of me. No problem in dropping such things, but proper credit should be given, even in casual conversation.
4
posted on
06/16/2003 7:20:02 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
To: Pokey78
Seems like much ado about nothing to me.
If something is, in fact a 'trend', then to speak of it in similar terms strikes me as not being unusual.
5
posted on
06/16/2003 7:23:47 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
('Any government that robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on Paul's vote' - G. B. Shaw (mod.))
To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post. I remember Dowd claiming Bush had said that al Quaeda was "not a threat anymore" and thinking that didn't sound right, that it didn't sound like something Bush would have said. Now the truth is out that Bush DIDN'T say that at all, and Dowd clearly intentionally misrepresented his statement. Another one who does this all the time is Molly Ivins; she takes little snippets of speeches, omits key phrases, and makes it appear that something outrageous is being said when in fact that is not the case.
To: Pokey78
I believe that the _Pravda Rule Book For Sleazy Left Wingers Who Work For The Media_, in the section on "Distortions" allows the worker of one left-wing media outfit to steal the "word, concept, or idea" of the worker for another sleazty left wing media outlet "...without attribution or citation." Sorry.
7
posted on
06/16/2003 7:30:43 AM PDT
by
Tacis
To: Pokey78
For what it's worth, Starbucks and latte are pretty much shorthand for a certain kind of politically correct postmodernist person. If you've seen the movie "Best in Show" you'll recognize the comic possibilities.
I think I'll stick to calling on Dowd to apologize publicly for her ellipses in all the venues in which her lying column appeared. And I'll also continue to point out that she's the most hormone-drunk, over-the-top, feather-headed writer of bad prose out there today.
She's post-gonzo incarnate.
8
posted on
06/16/2003 7:36:23 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Steve_Seattle
There should be an annual "Molly" award for the biggest, most blatant plagiarism published in a national newspaper or magazine. Suggest we get Rush to be Master of Ceremonies for the awards dinner. Perhaps there could be a couple of lesser awards, given to those journalists who tell the biggest whoppers. A "Silver Dowd" statuette with chevrons would be nice.
To: Pokey78
Uncanny coincidence?
I think not.
10
posted on
06/16/2003 7:41:45 AM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: Mr. Bird
I like that. Think I'll copy it into my next posting without attribution!
11
posted on
06/16/2003 7:42:18 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
To: elhombrelibre
Dowd is rapidly being exposed as one of those people who hears a good quip or interesting comment and saves it to drop as her own. Such people annoy the hell out of me. No problem in dropping such things, but proper credit should be given, even in casual conversation.
Or at least that's what I was thinking (wink, wink).
12
posted on
06/16/2003 7:43:20 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
To: Pokey78
SPOTREP
To: Pokey78
If Bush said, "I hate it when people say I have no compassion for the poor," perhaps Dowd would quote him as saying, "I hate . . . the poor." That would be about as honest as her use of ellipses in Bush's comments about al Quaeda.
To: LiteKeeper
what the hell is SPOTREP? You do that on every single thread.
To: Pokey78
Considering that Dowd is full of used food...
16
posted on
06/16/2003 10:49:31 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Charlie OK
I am a retired Army officer (artillery, MI, and chaplain). I have the privilege of teaching several classes in Colorado Springs to high school, college, and adults on comparative worldviews (biblical vs secular). As I read the various threads, some impress me as good for illustrating different worldviews. So, using some Army terminology, I mark "incidents" as "SPOTREPS" (spot report) and "descriptions of the current world scene" as "SITREPs" (situation reports). When I get home, I download these SPOTREPs and SITREPs to a database for future use.
Does that help?
To: LiteKeeper
thanks. sorry to word that so harshly. I have seen you post that several times and could never figure out what it meant. Hard to convey emotion on a message board, but know that I was laughing while I asked what it meant. I wasnt mad or anything.
To: Charlie OK
Not a problem, thanks for asking. FreeRepublic has become a gold mine for illustrating to my students the very strange world that we live in. I find dozens of illustrations daily!
To: Charlie OK
And, BTW, it brings new, young Freepers in to the fold!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson