Skip to comments.
Hil's publishers seeing green (three-bag barfer)
NY DAILY NEWS ^
| June 16, 2003
| Daily News Staff
Posted on 06/16/2003 5:13:02 AM PDT by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: MEG33
you are correct......there was never an 8 million dollar "advance" payment......
41
posted on
06/16/2003 7:54:19 AM PDT
by
sfvgt
To: sfvgt
I think the term advance is used meaning two different things.To me advance is money upfront.
42
posted on
06/16/2003 7:58:11 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
when talking about things that are published, an advance commonly means an advance payment against sales......
43
posted on
06/16/2003 8:01:27 AM PDT
by
sfvgt
To: dighton; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; JLAGRAYFOX
I'm suggesting we use the Martha Model as the profile in crime for corporate wrongdoing: Martha has been indicted not for insider trading but b/c prosecutors have overwhelming evidence that she broke Title 18, Sec. 1505 of the United States Code, which makes it a felony crime to obstruct and impede a lawful investigation by the federal government. Apparently Martha entered into a conspiracy to hide the truth by lying to investigators from the getgo which is a crime all by itself, even though she may or may not be subsequently charged with insider trading or something else. Martha and her broker are charged with calculatedly lying to government investigators - repeatedly, continuously and consciously - over a period of at least three months for the express purpose of covering up their actions. Martha is charged with personally altering company records and colluding in a coverup. And when Martha went on the CBS morning show and told Jane Clayson and the audience (while chopping cabbage), that there was nothing to worry about, she was actually breaking the law by deceiving her stockholders b/c she failed to alert her stockholders that there indeed was a problem. Collusion? Cover-up? Lying? Hitlery's fingerprints are all over this, as well (smirk). As I pinged to you earlier, bookmark this page to use as evidence.
And keep the Martha Model in your mind's eye as the Simon & Schuster story unfolds.
44
posted on
06/16/2003 8:09:00 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Collusion? Cover-up? Lying? Gosh, I hope Hitlery is not a part of this (smirk).Everything the woman touches turns to scandal. But, as usual, S&S employees will hang, Hillary will, "Who me? Lil ole victim me?" and Katie Communist will say "Move on, it just about sex.."
45
posted on
06/16/2003 8:11:26 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: TomGuy
Not on the NY Times Best Seller List either.
To: Liz
And keep the Martha Model in your mind's eye as the Simon & Schuster story unfolds. will do and thanks for your efforts.
47
posted on
06/16/2003 8:38:34 AM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, we're ridding the world of vermin. RATs are next!!)
To: cardinal4
The conniving Clintons perpetrated corruption on a massive scale. Theirs was corruption so endemic, it was tantamount to sedition.
48
posted on
06/16/2003 9:27:15 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Hmmmm? According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? Geeeeeee! I bet I can take a wild guess and get it correct ...??
49
posted on
06/16/2003 12:25:02 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Liz
ROTFLOL - love the trailer! See my #49
50
posted on
06/16/2003 12:27:38 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: All
Thought you all would find this interesting ...
According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? Geeeeeee! I bet I can take a wild guess and get it correct ...??
51
posted on
06/16/2003 12:30:17 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: TomGuy; Liz; Labyrinthos
Maybe Publisher's Weekly put it, correctly, on its Fiction list.
To: CyberAnt; SFConservative; Labyrinthos; TomGuy; BOBTHENAILER
She won't be laughing for long if Simon & Schuster can't prove to the shareholders that
their sales figures were booked properly. And where did S&S book the $8M outlay?
53
posted on
06/16/2003 1:41:58 PM PDT
by
Liz
To: PJ-Comix
Something here is bogus. Excluding all other costs, they would need to earn about $13.33 per book to cover Hillary's advance of $8 million if 600,000 books were sold. My understanding is that Sams and Walmart are selling it for about $15. I also remember hearing earlier that the book would need to sell about 2 million copies for it to be profitable (I guess this assumes $4 per book profit). Does anyone here know about how much a publisher makes per book given the price and advance in Hildabeasts case?
To: Liz
http://www.viacom.com If there are any questions regarding stock, please call:
Shareholder Relations- (800) 516-4399 or, if other questions, call: Headquarters- (212) 258-6000
55
posted on
06/16/2003 1:58:27 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Liz
She won't be laughing for long if Simon & Schuster can't prove to the shareholders that their sales figures were booked properly. And where did S&S book the $8M outlay? With the Enron Accounting Company.
56
posted on
06/16/2003 4:46:55 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(He Who Laughs Last Was Too Dumb To Figure out the Joke First)
To: CyberAnt
Hmmmm? According to Rush this morning - there was a worker from S&S who said there was no way they had printed 1 mil books - the reason was because they had no place to store it. Also ... according to same worker ... the story of 200,000 the first day was a calculation they could not possibly be able to make and they didn't know where the number came from ...?? O'Reilly really needs to interview a S&S exec on his show.
57
posted on
06/16/2003 4:48:33 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(He Who Laughs Last Was Too Dumb To Figure out the Joke First)
To: PJ-Comix
The accounting company booking S&S' Hitlery deal is in a lose-lose situation. They are going to have to (1) add up the figures to suckup to Hitlery and risk flaunting the law ala Enron-Arthur Andersen, or (2) play by the rules and show Hitlery and S&S to be colluding in a fraud.
58
posted on
06/16/2003 9:55:00 PM PDT
by
Liz
To: jimbo123
The calls are starting to come in, ladies and gentleman. It won't be long now.
59
posted on
06/16/2003 9:57:01 PM PDT
by
Liz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson